liquer Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 The tradition is for the woman takes her husbands name. Do you think the woman should take her husbands name? Or should he take his wife’s or should they have double-barrelled name? Link to comment
Sn0man Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 I'm a traditionalist, so I think the woman should take the man's name. It's not like we don't pay them for it.... lol Link to comment
Tethryn Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 Interesting Fact: If you analyze a "traditional" marriage (Some might call it "nit-picking") you find that it's surprisingly sexist... In the end, I say do what ever you want/feel comfortable with! Link to comment
liquer Posted January 8, 2009 Author Share Posted January 8, 2009 I'm a great believer in tradition to, especially traditional positions. But, I suppose the name thing doesn't matter so much now does it? Link to comment
liquer Posted January 8, 2009 Author Share Posted January 8, 2009 Interesting Fact: If you analyze a "traditional" marriage (Some might call it "nit-picking") you find that it's surprisingly sexist... In the end, I say do what ever you want/feel comfortable with! Well said! Link to comment
ButterflyWrists Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 I would have my husband to be have my last name if I did not like his last name. But other than that, I would take on their name. Especially if they were the only male in the family with that last name still able to have kids. And we had kids after marriage. Link to comment
Tezza Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 It is not really that important, there a quite a few cultures that do not practice this. Depending on the surname of my husband, I may choose to change it when I get married. Link to comment
DaBladeRoden Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 My last name is too awesome for a woman not to take it when marrying me. It's a deal breaker. Link to comment
Crazyaboutdogs Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 I would keep my own name. In this day and age with the divorce rates, you have women adopting their husband's name and then reverting back to their name after the divorce and then adopting their next husband's name and then going back to their name when that marriage ends in divorce. That creates all kinds of paperwork complications not to mention nobody knows what to call you anymore! I have lived all my life with my own name and I would not change it for someone else's last name. Link to comment
Portage Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 Well, i say it is all about the marriage NOT the last name, however, If you are having kids i prefer the family to all share in the same last name. It sounds closer knit and more of a bond. I think it is healthier for the child. Link to comment
CallingAllAngels Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 I took my husband's last name. Now I am divorced. It's a hassel to go back to my maiden name so I still have his name. But, if I was to marry again, I would take my new husband's last name. Something about that just makes you "one". Link to comment
allypally Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 My SIL has a double-barrel name - I think thats the N.American way. So her family name comes first followed by my brothers name (our family name). Link to comment
D_Lish Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 I'd like a double barrel name, then I'd feel posh and be like the aristocracy Link to comment
_Asti_ Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 My sister and I are the end of the line for our last name, but I really don't know what I will do. Personally, I don't like the double last name. I'll most likely just take his name. Link to comment
liquer Posted January 8, 2009 Author Share Posted January 8, 2009 I'd like a double barrel name, then I'd feel posh and be like the aristocracy Well I wouldn't recommend getting married just for that reason. Link to comment
allypally Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 I think double barrell names are pretentious. So many people have them now, its like a status thing. Link to comment
FortunateOne Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 When I do marry it will be for love and not a name; thereforee, my future wife will have the option. Oh! As for the children I don't mind a double barrel name. Link to comment
Scorpion Fury Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 I am traditional. I will take my husband's name when I get married, and our children will have his name too. I personally think hyphenated names are ridiculous Link to comment
Scorpion Fury Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 I think double barrell names are pretentious. So many people have them now, its like a status thing. Yeah, especially if they're both long Link to comment
jenny_mcs Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 I did not change my name. We'll re-visit the subject when we have kids. Link to comment
Hope75 Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 The tradition is for the woman takes her husbands name. Do you think the woman should take her husbands name? Or should he take his wife’s or should they have double-barrelled name? I don't think there are any 'shoulds', it's whatever the couple feels comfortable with. I am traditional so I took my husband's name, but I know couples where the woman kepts her maiden name, or the husband took her name too and I think it's fine. Link to comment
Emernate Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 I have always wondered what will happen when two people with hyphenated last names want to combine last names. "Hi, i'm Bob Brown-Smith-Jones-Johnson." Link to comment
livinginsbi Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 My last name is too awesome for a woman not to take it when marrying me. It's a deal breaker. In fact... his last name is SO awesome.. I just may change my name to that, just because! lol j/k I couldn't resist! Link to comment
NowandZen Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 I'm not sure it matter to kids nowadays. My wife and I were talking about our 14 y/o's friends, and I think we came up with just ONE who lives with both biological parents. So many blended families, different last names, nobody gives it a second thought. Funny story, my former neighbor, somebody I knew in high school mind you, had a convo with my wife in which it became apparent that she thought I was my wife's SECOND husband, and that the 14 y/o was mine, and the 19 y/o was not. My last name is not weird, but it's not one you would forget. I would not insist on my wife taking it. As for children, I suppose everybody has to cross that bridge. I've crossed it and burned it. Link to comment
definitely_maybe Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 I have always wondered what will happen when two people with hyphenated last names want to combine last names. "Hi, i'm Bob Brown-Smith-Jones-Johnson." Exactly what I was thinking. Hyphenated names can spiral out of control. I say take the man's name. If one is so worried about hassles after they get divorced, maybe they should not be getting married in the first place. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.