Jump to content

What’s next?


Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Jaunty said:

It's exhibited by people with various personality disorders and also by various individuals who have problems with relationships.  

No way am I getting into diagnosing anyone or joining into the ridiculous overuse of the pop psychology labels du jour, which evidently, today, focus on calling people "avoidants."    I do not agree that "avoidant" is even a noun. 

I feel the same way about "attachment styles". People do what they do because that's what they do. Until they're diagnosed by a medical professional who attributes their behaviors to an actual medical condition I am loathe to find pop psychology scapegoats or labels for how adults choose to interact.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
1 minute ago, boltnrun said:

I feel the same way about "attachment styles". People do what they do because that's what they do. Until they're diagnosed by a medical professional who attributes their behaviors to an actual medical condition I am loathe to find pop psychology scapegoats or labels for how adults choose to interact.

I think that's why there are dozens of posts here where people are describing themselves and a boatload of other people as "avoidants." And then posting videos about said "avoidants" and all the different methods there are of achieving the label of "avoidant."

It's been "love languages,"  the "16 MBTI types," "men are from mars women from venus," "alpha theory" "PUA,"  and I can't even remember the rest, since I've been participating in this board and others similar.  It's really funny and sometimes very annoying.  

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

In truth, and although I've talked about it too, I think "attachment styles" are a hoax to get people into therapy, in some cases on meds, all to make the doctors and therapists rich! 😆

If they're a real thing, then I must be one of the most screwed up people on the planet 🙄 as I've been accused of being at various times depending on the man and relationship - avoidant, commitmentphobe, insecure, too secure, too attached, too detached, the list goes on.

And jmo but when it comes attachment styles, I think everyone can flip from one style to another depending on who they're dating/in a relationship with.  Or what's happening in their lives at that time.

That's not to take away from a genuine spectrum or personality disorder or mental illness and yes one would need to be diagnosed by a medical professional to determine that.

I'm just not buying this "attachment style" stuff anymore and think it's a load of huey. 

JMO 😂

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
15 minutes ago, rainbowsandroses said:

In truth, and although I've talked about it too, I think "attachment styles" are a hoax to get people into therapy, in some cases on meds, all to make the doctors and therapists rich! 😆

If they're a real thing, then I must be one of the most screwed up people on the planet 🙄 as I've been accused of being at various times depending on the man and relationship - avoidant, commitmentphobe, insecure, too secure, too attached, too detached, the list goes on.

And jmo but when it comes attachment styles, I think everyone can flip from one style to another depending on who they're dating/in a relationship with.  Or what's happening in their lives at that time.

That's not to take away from a genuine spectrum or personality disorder or mental illness and yes one would need to be diagnosed by a medical professional to determine that.

I'm just not buying this "attachment style" stuff anymore and think it's a load of huey. 

JMO 😂

To add, even the books I've read AND recommended say it - that people can flip from one "style" to another depending, so what does THAT tell ya?

That it's a load of huey and therapists know it!! 

I'm calling myself out on that for recommending such books, I'm ashamed for doing so and falling for the BS.

All done to pad their pockets and they're probably laughing all the way to the bank too. 

Rant over guys.

Nite.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Just came back from holiday and wow...same old same old. 

I read all 25 pages, have no opinion about the situation, not anymore (already gave my 50s cents many times in Whirl's sagas :D ) , but I'm thinking , maybe Whirl "punishes"us by not showing us the next "episode", because we are also a disappointing mirror?

Whirl?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
37 minutes ago, kehratha said:

Just came back from holiday and wow...same old same old. 

I read all 25 pages, have no opinion about the situation, not anymore (already gave my 50s cents many times in Whirl's sagas :D ) , but I'm thinking , maybe Whirl "punishes"us by not showing us the next "episode", because we are also a disappointing mirror?

Whirl?

😂 I think a few of us have become addicted to this thread, even though it infuriates us at times we're all waiting for the next episode.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
20 hours ago, rainbowsandroses said:

To add, even the books I've read AND recommended say it - that people can flip from one "style" to another depending, so what does THAT tell ya?

That it's a load of huey and therapists know it!! 

I'm calling myself out on that for recommending such books, I'm ashamed for doing so and falling for the BS.

All done to pad their pockets and they're probably laughing all the way to the bank too. 

Rant over guys.

Nite.

(Sighs)

Attachment Theory

Following considerable empirical and research validation, it has become a pivotal consideration in the field of child protection and in care and protection proceedings in courts. Under the theory, the earliest bonds formed by children with their primary caregiver/s (particularly before 4 years of age) have a tremendous impact (affecting neurological, physical, cognitive, emotional and social development), which continues throughout life. The theory’s most important tenet is that an infant needs to establish a positive relationship with at least one primary caregiver for social and emotional development to occur normally, and that further relationships build on the patterns developed in these early experiences.”

Link to comment

I'm not saying "attachment styles" don't exist. I just don't agree with the concept that someone's "attachment style" eliminates the ability to CHOOSE one's actions. We can always "help it" unless a diagnosed (or sometimes UNdiagnosed but legitimate) medical condition renders us incapable of choosing our own actions, such as schizophrenia.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
19 minutes ago, Kampuniform3 said:

(Sighs)

Attachment Theory

Following considerable empirical and research validation, it has become a pivotal consideration in the field of child protection and in care and protection proceedings in courts. Under the theory, the earliest bonds formed by children with their primary caregiver/s (particularly before 4 years of age) have a tremendous impact (affecting neurological, physical, cognitive, emotional and social development), which continues throughout life. The theory’s most important tenet is that an infant needs to establish a positive relationship with at least one primary caregiver for social and emotional development to occur normally, and that further relationships build on the patterns developed in these early experiences.”

Yes and thankfully a positive loving relationship with my dad was established from a very early age but yet as said previously...

20 hours ago, rainbowsandroses said:

I've been accused of being at various times depending on the man and relationship - avoidant, commitmentphobe, insecure, too secure, too attached, too detached, the list goes on.

And those accusations would be correct!

How do you explain? 

Even our dear OP admitted in another thread that he was "avoidant" with a woman back in February but yet with Dr Lady, he's NOT avoidant, SHE is!

We are all one big huge mix of everything and depending on the relationship we can exhibit different 'styles' at different times. 

My opinion of course, but a strong one. 

 

Link to comment
7 hours ago, LootieTootie said:

WD's silence reminds me of NorthDallas' silence. When it looks like they might have found the one, they disappear...

Well WD, I hope you come back and provide an update. I am pulling for you and drlady.

I reckon he’s probably at the beach house with her, hopefully they’re having easy going fun enjoying each others company and not a ton of needlessly intense or drama filled convos 🤞 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...