grymoire Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 In this photo, who do you think is more attractive? Tell us why you picked her. I would choose the girl on the right (Kim Kardashian) for dating, fun, and sex.. and the girl on the left for marriage Link to comment
Myk_ Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 I would choose the girl on the right (Kim Kardashian) for dating, fun, and sex.. and the girl on the left for marriage BUT how could you marry a bird who youd never dated, had any fun with, or shagged? lol Link to comment
grymoire Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 BUT how could you marry a bird who youd never dated, had any fun with, or shagged? lol I will marry her and continue to date Kim Kardashian Link to comment
Gratsy Posted January 17, 2008 Author Share Posted January 17, 2008 I would choose the girl on the right (Kim Kardashian) for dating, fun, and sex.. and the girl on the left for marriage Yeah but you also have to say "why" Link to comment
grymoire Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Yeah but you also have to say "why" I would choose Kim for dating and sex because she looks really hot and has a sexy body. The sex would be great and I guess I can have lot of fun with her. However she is not long term relationship material... I can't imagine her as the mother of my kids. So for that I would choose the girl on the left. This is similar to girls dating bad boys but marrying a nice decent guy. Link to comment
Madoc Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Neither one but the closest one to my "Type" is right. Link to comment
ghost69 Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 She gave the point of this thread in the 'Do you think Kim Kadashian is fat thread' She said it was to see how idea's of beauty vary...which we can clearly see in this thread. I did answer the who I would choose question, the day the thread started. I answered that I couldn't choose cause I think they are both very hot in totally different ways. but honestly the more I think about it, I'd like to do the one on the right more, I love her curves - but in a relationship I'd find her intimidating & would choose the one on the left she has a very beautiful sweet look...hope that answers it better for you. i guess my question is why would you find the one on the right intimidating to date? i don't understand that. Link to comment
My3sStillRacing Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 Yes, I'm a woman, but I like posts like these. The girl on the left is much more natural. I think if a guy was having sex with the girl on the right, and she was riding him, he'd end up with a broken nose and some black eyes. There's no way those breasts keep their gravity. Not a fan of huge ones, at all. Just my personal opinion. But, I like the girl who looks like a hooker's waistline much better. When having sex with the one on the left, she'd be broken in no time. So it's a sacrifice. Snap the one girl in half, or have the other girls boobs do the killing? Link to comment
midnightrambler Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 Yes, I'm a woman, but I like posts like these. The girl on the left is much more natural. I think if a guy was having sex with the girl on the right, and she was riding him, he'd end up with a broken nose and some black eyes. There's no way those breasts keep their gravity. Not a fan of huge ones, at all. Just my personal opinion. But, I like the girl who looks like a hooker's waistline much better. When having sex with the one on the left, she'd be broken in no time. So it's a sacrifice. Snap the one girl in half, or have the other girls boobs do the killing? quote of the day Link to comment
ghost69 Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 i've been with a girl with bigger hoohoos. never had to have any nasal re-constructive surgery to be done or gotten any black eyes. Link to comment
TJ1986 Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 The one on the right hands down. She looks like a real woman=curvy, has hips, nice boobs (fake tho!) and just a little healthier looking. I like girls that look like they prob work-out but also EAT. ha Link to comment
Kyoshiro Ogari Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 The one on the left, easily, Caroline something. She looks like she's not trying to hard, and I'm not questioning if she is 100% real. Now Kim Kardashian and her aqua Reynolds Wrap dress is stunning, but... well, it's hard to explain. There is a type of beauty where the woman looks like she takes care of herself, but it doesn't look like a 5 hour job. Kim looks like she is VERY well put together and physically flawless, but I can tell (and with her being a socialite) that her looks are the nucleus of her world. I can admire her when she passes by and do that guy talk "yeah I'd hit that" stuff, but I wanna take Caroline home to mom. Link to comment
ghost69 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 The one on the left, easily, Caroline something. She looks like she's not trying to hard, and I'm not questioning if she is 100% real. Now Kim Kardashian and her aqua Reynolds Wrap dress is stunning, but... well, it's hard to explain. There is a type of beauty where the woman looks like she takes care of herself, but it doesn't look like a 5 hour job. Kim looks like she is VERY well put together and physically flawless, but I can tell (and with her being a socialite) that her looks are the nucleus of her world. I can admire her when she passes by and do that guy talk "yeah I'd hit that" stuff, but I wanna take Caroline home to mom. i like ur explanations. but i'd rather take kim home to mom. Link to comment
Papillion Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 the one on the left. she's thinner, younger, fresher, more natural, better dressed. Link to comment
Miss Firecracker Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 I don't really know how a man could find the girl on the left attractive. She looks like something from photos of WWII. And if she had anything on top, she'd look exactly as "cheap" as the woman on the right. She has a very revealing outfit on, but in her case there is nothing to reveal. Link to comment
Miss Firecracker Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Here is more of Kim Kardashian. Men, really, you don't find her attractive? link removed Link to comment
JadedStar Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Miss F i would say that her curves are what men see mostly. LOL Link to comment
mrmaximum Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 The one on the left, easily, Caroline something. She looks like she's not trying to hard, and I'm not questioning if she is 100% real. Now Kim Kardashian and her aqua Reynolds Wrap dress is stunning, but... well, it's hard to explain. There is a type of beauty where the woman looks like she takes care of herself, but it doesn't look like a 5 hour job. Kim looks like she is VERY well put together and physically flawless, but I can tell (and with her being a socialite) that her looks are the nucleus of her world. I can admire her when she passes by and do that guy talk "yeah I'd hit that" stuff, but I wanna take Caroline home to mom. That is a very good explanation, kudos. Your avatar rules btw!! Cloud is the man!! Link to comment
mrmaximum Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Here is more of Kim Kardashian. Men, really, you don't find her attractive? link removed But it does depend on who you are and what your preferences are. No matter what you look like, not everyone is going to think your hot, or ugly. Link to comment
Miss Firecracker Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 But it does depend on who you are and what your preferences are. No matter what you look like, not everyone is going to think your hot, or ugly. That is so true. And it's really a good thing. Link to comment
Miss Firecracker Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Miss F i would say that her curves are what men see mostly. LOL I did an experiment on my husband once. Took photos of two women who were skinny and compared them to photos of them when they were what I considered normal weight. I asked him what he thought about one and then the next, and he couldn't even tell these were the same women. In both cases he thought the starving girls were more attractive. He thought the womanly ones were cheap looking. There was absolutely no difference in the way they dressed either, just more curvy. I think it's unacceptable for women to be women now. They are expected to look like little girls. It is the norm now. Link to comment
mrmaximum Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 That is so true. And it's really a good thing. Or else I would NEVER have gotten married!! Link to comment
ghost69 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 the one on the left. she's thinner, younger, fresher, more natural, better dressed. what is not natural about the one on the left? cause she has fake bewbs? she wasn't born with hoohoos. so she bought some. nothing wrong with curves. what about girls that naturally look like that? i know some. are they less natural? i don't see anything natural about the girl on the left that refuses to eat. Link to comment
JadedStar Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 I did an experiment on my husband once. Took photos of two women who were skinny and compared them to photos of them when they were what I considered normal weight. I asked him what he thought about one and then the next, and he couldn't even tell these were the same women. In both cases he thought the starving girls were more attractive. He thought the womanly ones were cheap looking. There was absolutely no difference in the way they dressed either, just more curvy. I think it's unacceptable for women to be women now. They are expected to look like little girls. It is the norm now. There is a difference tho between curvy and chubby or fat. Some people will use that term to describe a heavier woman and that is not really the right term. This Kim chick is curvy. No fat that I can see. There will be about a 50/50 toss up of the men who prefer that to the ones who prefer bone thin. It was nice to see the variety of answers here and that there was a pretty good split down the middle. THat is good news for women of all body types. Link to comment
ghost69 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 I don't really know how a man could find the girl on the left attractive. She looks like something from photos of WWII. And if she had anything on top, she'd look exactly as "cheap" as the woman on the right. She has a very revealing outfit on, but in her case there is nothing to reveal. lol. i snotted with laughter when i read that. last time i laugh with my nose. Link to comment
.jpg.1626fbc48c04fd9021fd315819807524.thumb.jpg.882936eb5901fa05cf31c75617acde2e.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.