Circumcised vs Uncircumcised

[Pandaman211]

I think penises look good in all shapes and sizes, bent to the right or to the left or straight or whatever man.

 

When I say sizes though... i do have to add a disclaimer: it needs to at least be substantial enough so I can FEEL something.

 

My sister once dated a guy whose erect penis was the size of a TAMPON.

 

Uh-huh.

 

It didn't last long.

 

 

LMAO! Poor guy. I hope he looked into penis enlargement

[superuber2go]

1) First off visual look of penis -- a penis is a penis.... nothin offending nor special about an uncircumsized one. But it has been said before that most porn stars tend to have s circumsized penis and really that's no reason to chase after that.

 

3) Uncircumcised for shizzle.... it's slides more and is easier to fake it when you have no idea what you are doing.. and if you know exactly what you are doing-- well then added bonus

 

4) Most would probably say circumcised because they think that uncircumcised men are dirty-- I prefer uncircumsized. If you find a responsible guy who has an IQ enough to wash himself... you will be good

 

5) Obviously due to my biased answers, uncircumcised. The big part of an orgasm for me is seeing my partner happy... for uncircumcised men, the most sensitive part of his penis is covered at all times but sex right? So they are ultimately easier to please and you just have a ball

 

6) Couldn' tell ya with the premature ejaculation thing..... it happens to the best of people

 

7) Uncircumcised!! Tis natural and they way it was intended

[Umlunguusa]

I personally think Male circumcision should be as illegal and with the same penalties as female circumcision. just because it's in the bible, doesn't mean it's right! I mean, did you know, when they circumcise a baby, they remove almost 50% of his penis? for all those girls saying "ew, uncircumcised=gross" how'd you like it if someone told you your clit was gross, and needed to be chopped off?

 

I'm uncircumcised, and proud--never had a complaint, and besides, most girls are fascinated with the foreskin anyways, sliding back and forth lol

[ScorpiGal83]

I personally think Male circumcision should be as illegal and with the same penalties as female circumcision. just because it's in the bible, doesn't mean it's right! I mean, did you know, when they circumcise a baby, they remove almost 50% of his penis? for all those girls saying "ew, uncircumcised=gross" how'd you like it if someone told you your clit was gross, and needed to be chopped off?

 

I'm uncircumcised, and proud--never had a complaint, and besides, most girls are fascinated with the foreskin anyways, sliding back and forth lol

 

Personally, it won't matter to me if the guy I marry and love with all my heart was cut or uncut, BUT

 

I prefer UNcircumsized. Yes the foreskin IS fascinating, and FUNCTIONAL too

[Lecturer]

... did you know, when they circumcise a baby, they remove almost 50% of his penis? ...

 

This thread is so full of fail I have avoided posting in it until now.. but come on... so many posts have so much terribly inaccurate, non-factual info I can't stand by. Not only is this particular statement untrue, but it defies common sense. I'm not argueing one way or another because I simply don't care.. but I can't stand erroneous info.

 

I can predict every post with greater than 90% accuracy by simply saying that a non-circumsized poster will say that not circumsizing is best, and circumsized posters will say that circumsizing is best... and females will say that whatever their current partner has is best.

[Daria_Lane]

so not into uncircumcised at all. Looks yucky, the extra skin is a turn off, for oral, you have to be so careful. Cant be bothered with that nonsense.

[Daria_Lane]

I when they circumcise a baby, they remove almost 50% of his penis?

 

Um. Crack a Bio book or something. It'd do you good.

 

also comparing FGM to male circumcision is highly offensive.

[LBP]

so not into uncircumcised at all. Looks yucky, the extra skin is a turn off, for oral, you have to be so careful. Cant be bothered with that nonsense.

 

Yeah, nothing like a little mutilation to improve aesthetic appeal.

[jonny15]

so not into uncircumcised at all. Looks yucky, the extra skin is a turn off, for oral, you have to be so careful. Cant be bothered with that nonsense.

 

 

Careful?

 

Why?

 

 

And nonsense?

 

Yea....keeping the skin where it is suppose to be is nonsense.

 

 

 

[diabolik]

so not into uncircumcised at all. Looks yucky, the extra skin is a turn off, for oral, you have to be so careful. Cant be bothered with that nonsense.

 

also comparing FGM to male circumcision is highly offensive.

 

Why is it offensive to compare (compare, not equate) FGM to male circumcision? You're so quick to chop off the nerve ending-rich foreskin, but not the nerve ending-rich clitoris?

[Daria_Lane]

Yeah, nothing like a little mutilation to improve aesthetic appeal.

 

is this supposed to mean anything to me? BTW I assume you can read, you'd see that the rest of my reasons go BEYOND "aesthetic appeal"

 

Read and learn. Some of us have other reasons, sorry to burst your bubble though

 

link removed

[Daria_Lane]

Why is it offensive to compare (compare, not equate) FGM to male circumcision? You're so quick to chop off the nerve ending-rich foreskin, but not the nerve ending-rich clitoris?

 

 

You really wanna compare the end result of both? Ever heard of a circumcised male NOT being able to enjoy sex? have YOU?

 

Btw, how about you read this link and learn a thing or two

 

link removed

 

It offends me as an African female that people would make such disgusting comparison and even go as far as defending it.

[diabolik]

You really wanna compare the end result of both? Ever heard of a circumcised male NOT being able to enjoy sex? have YOU?

 

Btw, how about you read this link and learn a thing or two

 

link removed

 

It offends me as an African female that people would make such disgusting comparison and even go as far as defending it.

1. Did I defend FGM?

2. I suggest you familiarize yourself with the definition of the word "compare", then "equate", then re-read my prior post.

[jonny15]

Mutilation in any form is discusting.

[LBP]

You really wanna compare the end result of both? Ever heard of a circumcised male NOT being able to enjoy sex? have YOU?

 

Btw, how about you read this link and learn a thing or two

 

link removed

 

It offends me as an African female that people would make such disgusting comparison and even go as far as defending it.

 

I have met circumcised men who do not enjoy sex. They are literally unable to finish during intercourse. More than one man has reported as much.

 

A link to support this anecdotal claim: link removed

 

For your convenience, two other links which contradict the news article you were kind enough to share:

 

link removed

 

link removed

 

I'm sure we could trade such links all day long. I was responding to your initial point that the foreskin of the penis is 'yucky' and that you 'can't be bothered,' which to my mind is an aesthetic rather than scientific stance on the issue. I find it hard to believe that in the heat of sexual excitement you'd turn away a man simply because he is uncut, but that's pure conjecture on my part.

 

Hey, if you prefer an unhooded winkie, more power to you.

[Daria_Lane]

[quote=LBP;3332348

 

link removed

 

I'm sure we could trade such links all day long. I was responding to your initial point that the foreskin of the penis is 'yucky' and that you 'can't be bothered,' which to my mind is an aesthetic rather than scientific stance on the issue. I find it hard to believe that in the heat of sexual excitement, you'd turn away a man simply because he is uncut, but that's pure conjecture on my part.

 

But, hey, if you prefer an unhooded winkie, more power to you.

 

Not sure what prostitution has to do with this thread but n/m

 

Should I be surprised that the only one you noticed out of my reasons was the fact that 1. it "looks yucky". I believe I mentioned other reasons. The last one being the one that annoys me the most. Pulling down foreskin for oral is a waste of my time plus being overly senstive while receiving oral is just bothersome IMO. That is what I meant by "nonsense". Such actions, not the penis themselves. I believe this is a forum where people should be able to share their personal opinions without others whining about it/trying to make them feel bad.

 

There are MANY woman who base it on just the look alone, so even if that was just my reason, why are people acting like it's a huge surprise or should people LIE on the internet to make others feel better? There's a bloody thread talking about how smaller vagina lips are better than bigger ones, yet I dont see anyone attacking the other for believing such. Ive been on this board long enough that Ive seen MANY threads that one would find offensive(cant date a girl with strech-marks, cant date a girl with small/huge nipples, blah blah) but hey people have the right to their opinions dont they without people hounding them, after all it's not gonna change their minds either way.

 

After all I can tell you none of the condescending replies have changed mine. It's one thing if I was going by "heresay" or "doctored pictures". This is something I believe cos Ive dealt with it and wouldnt want to again.

 

Also the % of men that who dont enjoy sex as circumcised is OBVIOUSLY rare compared to women that dont feel anything. Infact that's the MAIN reason for FGM. Advocates of this practice believe a woman that doesnt enjoy sex wont be promiscuous. Last I checked male circumcision wasnt done to destroy the sex lives of men, neither is "50% of the penis cut off". Not sure how mutilating the clitoris WITH THE INTENT of ruining the female's libido is the same as cutting a bit of foreskin which was believed to help with hygiene.

[LBP]

Not sure what prostitution has to do with this thread but n/m.

 

The article states that HIV transmission is directly related to the number of sex workers in a country... And not the rates at which men are or are not circumcised. This is relevant to the article you posted re: HIV and circumcision.

[Daria_Lane]

Care to quote where sex workers were mentioned cos NOTHING in that article mentions prostitution.

[LBP]

link removed

 

It is in this article...

 

This paper provides strong evidence that when conducted properly, cross country regression data does not support the theory that male circumcision is the key to slowing the AIDS epidemic. Rather, it is the number of infected prostitutes in a country that is highly significant and robust in explaining HIV prevalence levels accross countries. An explanation is offered for why Africa has been hit the hardest by the AIDS pandemic and why there appears to be very little correlation between HIV/AIDS infection rates and country wealth.

[Daria_Lane]

and there are many research articles that dont rely on blaming prostitues. After all where do these "evil prostitutes" get it from?

 

Anyway that's by the way. Point remains that I stated a personal opinion/preference. Whether a person wnats to believe that everyone that says "oh Im ok with it" is telling the truth, that's their business, same I would say to someone who tells another that "oh dont worry 4-5 inches is the ideal length", have fun believing that every girl thinks that. However some of us have no problem being truthful about our preferences no matter how "bitter" they may be. This should be encouraged and not scorned at.

[laisla]

There are MANY woman who base it on just the look alone, so even if that was just my reason, why are people acting like it's a huge surprise or should people LIE on the internet to make others feel better? There's a bloody thread talking about how smaller vagina lips are better than smaller ones, yet I dont see anyone attacking the other for believing such. Ive been on this board long enough that Ive seen MANY threads that one would find offensive(cant date a girl with strech-marks, cant date a girl with small/huge nipples, blah blah) but hey people have the right to their opinions dont they without people hounding them, after all it's not gonna change their minds either way.

 

good points.

[jonny15]

So....do we have someone here who is trying to make their preference for cut penises into a health issue?

 

 

I guess uncut penises are not natural and are only good for having diseases. lol

 

 

That's just ignorant.

 

 

My foreskin is normal and not disgusting.

[diabolik]

Quote:

This paper provides strong evidence that when conducted properly, cross country regression data does not support the theory that male circumcision is the key to slowing the AIDS epidemic. Rather, it is the number of infected prostitutes in a country that is highly significant and robust in explaining HIV prevalence levels accross countries. An explanation is offered for why Africa has been hit the hardest by the AIDS pandemic and why there appears to be very little correlation between HIV/AIDS infection rates and country wealth.

 

and there are many research articles that dont rely on blaming prostitues. After all where do these "evil prostitutes" get it from?

You seem to be so blinded by your own biases that you cannot look at research objectively. Neither LBP nor the article he quotes suggests that prostitutes are evil.

[Daria_Lane]

First off "disgusting" doesnt have a "c"

 

Secondly, people have various reasons for their preferences. Ive seen threads where people claim a girl with bushy pubic hair is most likely to "harbor crabs". Ironically I didnt notice an uproar. Perhaps it's only when the male ego is offended that we see/hear anything.

 

People have their reasons for believing whatever they do, I actually saw that article used in a list by some women on another board for their OWN reasons for not being for uncircumcised. Dont believe I said that was MY reason however. The sooner people accept that people have the right to their opinions, the better.

 

good points.

 

Thanks dear.

 

Funny thing is the guy I was with that wasnt circumised always speaks bad of his mom cos of it and he's the only one of his 3 brothers who isnt. Apparently two of his uncles were the same and they got the procedure done in their late 20s, which personally i find absurd. Mainly cos it's sooooo much more painful to do as an adult than as a baby. The thought of such pain. Damn.

[jonny15]

First off "disgusting" doesnt have a "c"

 

It's called a typo.

 

Maybe I should cut my hands off too?

 

Secondly, people have various reasons for their preferences. Ive seen threads where people claim a girl with bushy pubic hair is most likely to "harbor crabs". Ironically I didnt notice an uproar. Perhaps it's only when the male ego is offended that we see/hear anything.

 

Your comparing pubic hair to foreskin?

 

That can be trimmed or shaved.

 

Cutting off skin is totally different.

 

 

Foreskin is totally normal, and how a male is suppose to be.

 

That is not an opinion. That is a fact.

 

If it wasn't, then males wouldn't be born with it.