Internal Politics.

[Dako]

Luke,

 

You have a one-issue political party.

[Luke Skywalker]

Wow. Ok, I'm back from Trinidad. Of course, making scores about women-interactions and making judgements about that is an excellent way to deal with boredom.

 

Alright, tallying up all the scores on here are as follows:

23 entries with an overall score of -30, leading to an average of - 1.3.

That's just the lucky number, what can I say.

 

I've adopted the following code for determining negative scores on various interaction break-downs (i.e. fades, crash and burns, low interest from the girl, etc....) as follows:

 

Attraction Power 1 (means I like a girl because I'm just desperate, but wouldn't really like her) - negative score -1 to -4 .

 

Attraction Power 2 (means I like the girl sexually, as may be the case due to my own sexual inexperience and naivity, but once I get my fill, then I'm not likely to like this type to settle down with.) - negative score - 3 to -6.

 

Attraction Power 3 (means I like a girl romantically and sexually, and could be sort of nervous or shy with her, but I still have my head on. She may also subscribe to a particular ethnic fetish, or fetish of some kind). - negative score - 5 to -8.

 

Attraction Power 4 (means that I'm limerant on the girl and have a crush on her, put her on a pedistle and think she's sent by God to save me out of my singlehood). - negative score - 8 to - 10.

 

Also, principles of judgement would include - if there is a cause where I'm at fault because of my own naivity and I sent mixed messages to her that I may not be interested, thus contributing to the breakdown of interaction, then a default negative score of -5 is attributed to Attraction Power 2 and higher.

 

However, if it's an Attraction Power 1, then the default negative score in such a case shall be -3.

 

These are the fixed principles of making negative judgements - or formula of legal predents, so judgements have an element of predictability to them and are not just based on whim or emotions going out of control on any specific case - other than the bounds of the negative score range that is prescribed by the above code.

 

I certify thereforeeee, that all scores that are made on a negative scale are based on the above code and that these scores which these codes are based are accurate and will move to making a judgement what I think about my luck with women.

[Luke Skywalker]

Also adopting a renumeration structure based on the negative average scores for the month of February as follows: (what I may allow myself doesn't mean I have to do it, it's just a reward structure)

 

A average score: 0 to -1 : I shall allow myself to eat at buffets without the prerequisite of female companionship for the month.

-1 to -2 : Softcore porn shall be 'legal' to view between February 10th to February 18th, as long as it's free. Hardcore porn will still be out of limits for viewing, but with three strikes format. To counteract viewing porn, movies may be rented, or I can look at other stuff on youtube also within that time.

-2 to -3 : Hardcore porn shall also be 'legal' to view between February 10th to February 18th. Again, all of such must be free.

-3 to -4: On top of the above, an adult online ad will also be made, or it would be legal for me to directly ask girls if they want to have sex with me, whether outercourse or intercourse.

-4 to -5: Paid porn would be 'legal' to view between February 10th to February 18th.

-5 to -6: A strip club may be visited between February 10th to February 18th.

-6 to - 7: Last resort laws on following. (means a bona-fide attempt shall be made to make a direct sexual connection with someone, failing which, paid alternative sources would be sought.) Massage parlour.

-7 to - 8. Last resort - escort - half service type.

-8 to - 9. Last resort - escort - full service type.

-9 to -10. Leaving the country to go on a 'liberal place' where it's easy to find people to have sex with, and/or buy compansionship cheaper.

 

Accepting the above structure. As based on the concepts above - between February 10th - February 18th, softcore porn will be viewed, hardcore porn restricted, other movies may be rented out, and for the month of February, I will let myself to go Buffets of three or four different restaurants, by myself without any companion as based on the personal tradition I had prior to this system being in place.

 

A challenge was also made to go for a lower average score than the one reported because it is believed that my mom's influence is to repressive, and that going to a massage parlour may be a good idea with respect to that.

 

However, despite my mom's 'oppressive' influence, no negative score could be attributed to her and it's all a natural consequence. Scores which are zero or positive are not considered at all, although it may sort of 'suck'.

 

Set-up issues are untenable unless a girl actually rejects me because of my living arrangement with my parents. Furthermore, if I'm not comfortable living with my parents, that's beyond the jurisdiction of this book in this sector anyway, which only concerns itself with acting contrary to my established moral character in fixed intervals of time as a way of venting.

 

The case in point, is the trip to Trinidad, where I had a nice time meeting a girl online from the internet I was attracted to, but my Aunt and mom would not allow it for irrational reasons, a score of zero was attributed since it was not a negative break-down that's attributed to the girl, and a limited set-up problem like that means that a zero score is allocated instead of a negative score.

 

To motivate myself to get a negative score would require that I would beat such a set-up or deal with it in some way, but the fact that there existed a girl somewhere that was willing to meet me is good enough not to have a negative score in terms of experience there.

 

thereforeeee I conclude this judgement for the month of February, and for the dates of February 10th to February 18th. Since everything is 'free porn' and there is no intent to go beyond the date of February 18th, it will be limited to those dates.

 

Expendature of portable internet to get away from home, or laptop computer to watch movies may also be an option of my mom gets under my skin to guarantee that time and also deducted from any money I owe her from her paying to go on that trip I went on.

[sweetpea]

Luke, I have some questions.

 

Attraction Power 4 (means that I'm limerant on the girl and have a crush on her, put her on a pedistle and think she's sent by God to save me out of my singlehood). - negative score - 8 to - 10.

 

It appears that the negative score increases with attraction power. Is it reasonable to assume that this is the case because you have much lower success with the more highly valued women? If so, then we must analyze as to why that is the case. In an idealistic scenario, when approaching women, you would do equally well with all of them, or perhaps even better with those who are of higher value to you, because you would put more effort into the game. Is it because you change your approach, or is it because they are less responsive to you due to them being more highly valued by men in general, and they know it...?

 

 

-3 to -4: On top of the above, an adult online ad will also be made, or it would be legal for me to directly ask girls if they want to have sex with me, whether outercourse or intercourse.

 

Are you saying that you would put an ad online actually propositioning women for sex? I don't think you will get too many responses from an ad of that nature, and any that you DO get won't be from a highly valued girl, as per your own rating scale.

 

Outercourse? Not familiar with that term. Please clarify.

 

 

However, despite my mom's 'oppressive' influence, no negative score could be attributed to her and it's all a natural consequence.

 

I sense that you have a lot of anger towards your mother. Is that true?

 

 

The case in point, is the trip to Trinidad, where I had a nice time meeting a girl online from the internet I was attracted to, but my Aunt and mom would not allow it for irrational reasons

 

So the purpose of your trip was to meet a girl you met online? Even though your mom and aunt disproved, you went anyway? How'd it work out? Was she nice?

[Luke Skywalker]

Luke, I have some questions.

 

 

 

It appears that the negative score increases with attraction power. Is it reasonable to assume that this is the case because you have much lower success with the more highly valued women?

 

No, it's just a reflection of a score. If I am unsuccessful with a girl I'm not attracted to, then it shouldn't tip the scales so to speak as a bad experience.

 

Take for example, Attraction Power 1 - that type of girl I like because I'm dsperate and she's taking me on and nobody else likes me, but I really do not like her. If I fail with her, I cant claim a -10 score on that or I will be cheating my own system, but maybe I can claim, if it goes badly, a -4 as the scoring standard indicates.

 

If anything, if I want to make a case, then I'd only go after Attraction Power 3's or higher, and thus would try to claim more on that type of system rather than some joke pittance that I've got here for this February.

 

To reiterate, I can be unsuccessful with Attraction Power 1, Attraction Power 2, Attraction Power 3, Attraction Powre 4 - and the fact a negative score exists means it is unsuccessful, but the personal impact on that as a bad experience should be weighed accurately and fairly.

 

The concept is meant to moderate the scores so I will learn to put experiences into objective standard and perspective.

 

 

If so, then we must analyze as to why that is the case. In an idealistic scenario, when approaching women, you would do equally well with all of them, or perhaps even better with those who are of higher value to you, because you would put more effort into the game. Is it because you change your approach, or is it because they are less responsive to you due to them being more highly valued by men in general, and they know it...?

 

To explain how a system works, in order to have an entry, I need the following information.

 

1) a woman's name. 2) her phone number and/or commitment to go out with me.

(for Canadian women only, if it's another country, then a general impression of experience for that country is made (i.e. Italian experience, Trindiad experience, etc... and a score is made based on the experience whether negative, neutral or positive).

 

If I approach her and get neither, she cant be recorded down.

 

The negative entry is more designed if she flakes, gives the wrong number, renegs on a commitment to go out, builds up a false hope to just crush it afterwards, changes her mind about going out, etc....

 

The reason for this is efficiency. I cant write down every single entry and experience. This narrows it down. Furthermore, I will accuse myself for not trying hard as I'm quite sure I can get a name of a woman during a conversation, and a contact number at least some of the time if I'm trying.

 

 

Are you saying that you would put an ad online actually propositioning women for sex? I don't think you will get too many responses from an ad of that nature, and any that you DO get won't be from a highly valued girl, as per your own rating scale.

 

That is exactly what I'm saying. In practise, the last time this was done was November, 2006, and I had fun with it.

 

This is not part of the rating scale by the way. It's one of the stipulated rewards back on an average negative score, just like porn is a reward back. Being allowed to proposition any woman for sex is governed by the rules as written on this thread. It is a 'priviledge' to make an online ad that prepositions a woman for sex, even if I'm not actually sexual, to be spared only for occasions of negative averages that may warrent it.

 

 

Outercourse? Not familiar with that term. Please clarify.

 

Any non-penetrative sex. For example, doing breasts, cumming on the body, fingering, hand-jobs, foot-jobs, spanking, etc.....

 

 

I sense that you have a lot of anger towards your mother. Is that true?

 

My mom has not contributed to any negative score on this administration.

All negative scores was the woman's fault, not my mom's fault. Any score that is my mom or environment's fault gets a zero. Zero scores are not regarded, and neither are positive scores - thus it's protected because a forfeited opportunity is a forfeit, no matter who is blamed.

 

 

So the purpose of your trip was to meet a girl you met online? Even though your mom and aunt disproved, you went anyway? How'd it work out? Was she nice?

 

No, the purpose of the trip was a funeral of my Grand Aunt. I usually have miserable trips unless I have a connection with a girl. In this case, the Trinidad Experience has a positive rating of a 3 (no negative score).

 

The girl was nice. She responded to my email after I sent it and was prepared to meet me the next day. I was stunned. Most women here where I am play games and take forever to see me, and aren't the type of girls I'm that attracted to anyway. Here I get a nice looking girl who is ready to see me and she sounds legit and it's a normal dating ad.

 

If you read what I think about my online dating experiences from my other posts, you'd think that online dating is like pulling teeth to try and a painful process that just makes me feel bad as it reinforces a negative image that I cant find anyone who wants me that I'm also attracted to, while it worked out so nicely there. This is probably why I would resent my Aunt (who is not married by the way).

 

I may resent my Aunt because with all the rotten luck I have, I finally appear to get a break - and my esteem is so shot that I feel her protectiveness is unwarranted as it will likely crash and burn being myself anyway so what's the point. But, then again, ultimately I forfeited and caved into the pressure around me, and if I really wanted to, I could have just as well called a taxi and gone myself as I brought some money with me if need be. Since the score is a zero through due to the forfeit of opportunity, it is a non-issue, and whether or not I feel angry with my Aunt or mom is irrelevant because I realize I caved into my environment, and ultimately, that was my choice for being passive with respect to my environment and I forfeited - the score reflects this.

 

All in all I was shy to meet this girl - I guess I either get rotten luck with girls, or if I do get lucky with a girl, then something else goes wrong in the set-up where I cant meet the girl, so it's like a double whammy - but I rather a forefeit or something going wrong in a set-up then having a crash and burn or heart-break.

 

They also had Carnival there in Trinidad, where you could 'wind and jam' with women in public. Most women were skantly clothed and you could rub with their bottoms. My mom had me on a leech there. I said hi to some girls and they said hi back. I felt rather positive about the trip and gave it a + 3 score since I felt a nice connection there in general.

 

Like I said, this could have been a +10 experience, and could have 'defeated' the negative average score on the system, so in that sense it's a bit of a loss with me.

[sweetpea]

Ok,

 

So...

 

You ended your trip with a +3 postive experience rating, you emailed a nice girl who was ready to meet you the next day, but did you actually go out with her? Or any other girls? For some reason I am not too clear on that part.

 

The rest of it I think I have fairly well figured out. Except that how can you have a postive experience rating if you never even went out with a girl or even touched one the whole trip?

[Luke Skywalker]

Ok,

 

So...

 

You ended your trip with a +3 postive experience rating, you emailed a nice girl who was ready to meet you the next day, but did you actually go out with her? Or any other girls? For some reason I am not too clear on that part.

 

The rest of it I think I have fairly well figured out. Except that how can you have a postive experience rating if you never even went out with a girl or even touched one the whole trip?

 

A + 3 rating out of 10. That's a weak positive. I did talked to girls, say hi to them, and did feel rather happy that this girl responded quickly to my ad and was prepared to meet me. Another girl said hi to me out of the blue from her car that looked similar to the girl on the internet. Another girl blew a kiss on camera when I was video-taping the carnival crowd.

 

My Aunt had some female Spanish students from Venezuala she was teaching English to and I talked to one of them and she invited me (and my mom) to her home in Venezuala to do some sightseeing there.

 

All in all, I think I rate it a weak positive since I was not entirely miserable on the trip.

 

I also talked to a lady on the airplane when driving back. When travelling to the place, some other girl seemed to be smiling and flirting with me on an opposite aisle of the plane.

 

You may not have to touch or date to have a sense of a connection with someone. Even a simple and spontenous hello could do the trick where there it just clicks and you feel that connection with someone you like - that can make a day.

 

However- I will say, that initially I thought a zero score was the most accurate for this trip, but then I thought it wasn't so bad, and I felt alright, so I put that score there. But with an average based on 29 entries, a zero or plus three cant change the negative average range that the 29 scores are set in, and would just be an academical.

[zestygirl]

Luke;

 

I found your post interesting, and candid.

 

I first want to answer your very first question - yes, I have internal accounting systems - we all should. Like:

 

- If I run for 20 minutes on the treadmill, I can have ice cream.

- If I work 2 hours of overtime, I can buy the new clothes.

- Since I was super lazy yesterday, I must make up for it today by doing extra housework.

 

These rituals are normally designed to help keep us in a balanced state. What you describe seems as though it began along the same vein, but evolved into something that almost has a life of it's own....

 

It reminds me strongly of the counting and food rituals practiced, for example, by girls with eating disorders.

 

It also reminds me of the OCD rituals - and the related scenarios that develop in certain cases of schizophrenia....

 

I'm not suggesting that you have OCD or are schizophrenic, what I AM suggesting is that these types of rituals can become Golems...where the original intention of "calorie counting" or "penny pinching" gives way to an all out obsessive behaviour that can become it's own sickness...

 

It seems that you evolved this sytem from good-hearted genuine intentions. You are focusing on some psycho-sexual issues that you are clearly attempting to heal. In that regard - GOOD FOR YOU!!! That is definitely a step in the right direction.

 

May I make the off-handed suggestion of trying something new? Different from personal ads, or internal accounting systems to recover from porn addiction stemming from "incel" (cute abbreviation): Perhaps try to work on your soul, and make healthy yourself and your outlook - from the inside out, without even considering your porn addiction for now, perhaps reading a few books on meditation or philosophy, eastern religion, Deepak Chopra for example....maybe your head will clear a little and you will begin to attract girls because you are a more peaceful and centered person...certainty and clarity shine like beacons and attract people like magnets!

 

Also - the "fat" "ugly" girls you mention - perhaps you will develop the ability to more easily see inner beauty...even finding a companion who may not be Venus on the outside, but completes you nonetheless!

 

I hope I haven't offended you. You seem like an extraordinarily bright guy (think John Forbes!) There is a very fine line between genius and madness indeed! The very intelligent often suffer the burdens of their own minds...

 

(Hope that flattery makes up for anything that might be construed as an insult....)

 

 

[sweetpea]

did feel rather happy that this girl responded quickly to my ad and was prepared to meet me.

 

Another girl blew a kiss on camera when I was video-taping the carnival crowd.

 

But with an average based on 29 entries

 

Luke...

 

I don't think it's reasonable to count a kiss that a girl blows because she finds herself on camera as a ratable interaction. No wonder you got to 29 entries. If you go to a store and buy something, and the woman hands you change and smiles, what do you rate that one as?

 

And DID YOU go out with the girl who wanted to see you the next day?

 

IF not, why not?

[Luke Skywalker]

Luke...

 

I don't think it's reasonable to count a kiss that a girl blows because she finds herself on camera as a ratable interaction.

 

That was not specifically rated - the only thing that was rated was the overall Trinidad experience.

 

Very well, I signed for a zero score initially. No big deal. I'll change the rating to zero then. Not a bad experience, not a great experience either.

 

It's good to see people on here agree that I am just having a hard time.

 

No wonder you got to 29 entries. If you go to a store and buy something, and the woman hands you change and smiles, what do you rate that one as?

 

In Canada, ratings require a name and phone number and/or commitment to see me. Outside of Canada the rating system is just the overall impression or experience of that country.

 

And DID YOU go out with the girl who wanted to see you the next day?

 

I already told you no. I'm back here in Canada. Alright, a score of zero for this trip. I signed for that score - lets leave it at that.

 

IF not, why not?

 

My Aunt I was staying at had strong reservations against meeting women from the internet. She was paranoid I was a security threat and would have given her information about where she lived and didn't trust me. She didn't trust the girl and felt she was going to be accompanied by a criminal gang, kidnap me, and I'd wind up dead by the bushes in the island.

 

She then tells the story of how another cousin meet an attractive Indian girl, who drove him south to San Fernando, and introduced him to her several brothers, who then tried to force him to marry her. When he refused, they took all his money and left him stranded there. Fortunately he was able to get help to take him home.

 

My Aunt then wanted to talk to her to find out the address she works, and see for herself if she actually works there. I just said forget about the whole thing. After all, as a woman she could have issues about trusting me to, after all, how doesn't she know I'm not a bandit myself? Pycho aunt.

 

They promised to take me to the mall, backed out of the last second, and told me to call the girl to cancel.

 

The mall the girl was supposed to meet me at was cried down by another Aunt as being infested with bandits and thereforeeee dangerous.

 

Then came Carnival, then came the last day I was in Trinidad where I had to visit relatives, then came the airplane taking me home and now I'm here.

[Luke Skywalker]

Luke;

 

Perhaps try to work on your soul, and make healthy yourself and your outlook - from the inside out, without even considering your porn addiction for now, perhaps reading a few books on meditation or philosophy, eastern religion, Deepak Chopra for example....maybe your head will clear a little and you will begin to attract girls because you are a more peaceful and centered person...certainty and clarity shine like beacons and attract people like magnets!

 

That is outside of the jurisdiction of this thread/Green book. It's only concerned in recording registered interactions and doesn't take any position other than making accurate scoring.

 

In your post, if it is in any way profitable, you are saying my scoring determinations are not accurate because I'm sick. I would say that if anything, that I'm not sick otherwise, why would I be seeking to make accurate negative scores? Wouldn't I just paint everything black one time and just say women suck, and say let me just rate everyone and everything a -10, say all women are just bad?

 

No, I'm more interested in accuracy. I think the system is showing balance or it would have more skewed negative scores closer to the maximum range. This looks more concillitory on the other hand.

 

 

Also - the "fat" "ugly" girls you mention - perhaps you will develop the ability to more easily see inner beauty...even finding a companion who may not be Venus on the outside, but completes you nonetheless!

 

I did not mention 'fat' or 'ugly' girls. I mentioned Attraction Power, (i.e. like a torque of an electric motor in levels) It's a subjective judgement since beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

 

 

I hope I haven't offended you. You seem like an extraordinarily bright guy (think John Forbes!) There is a very fine line between genius and madness indeed! The very intelligent often suffer the burdens of their own minds...

 

That's why this system is posted here for public scrutiny.

[sweetpea]

In Canada, ratings require a name and phone number and/or commitment to see me. Outside of Canada the rating system is just the overall impression or experience of that country.

 

 

Luke,

 

You lost me. You said you had 29 ratable interactions with women. Now you say its just an "overall" experience that gets rated.

 

Which is it? 29 individual women that you had some sort of communication with, or just a total score from your trip?

 

I am really trying to publicly scrutinize your methods as requested but there is some ambiguity here that must be cleared up.

[Luke Skywalker]

Luke,

 

You lost me. You said you had 29 ratable interactions with women. Now you say its just an "overall" experience that gets rated.

 

From October 25th, 2007 to February 3rd, 2008 all ratable interactions are being recorded on the Fifth Administration (or fifth interval of ratings since this system is set up). I went to Trinidad on January 24th - Febuary 7th, which is within that time-zone. The trip got rated overall as an experience. Prior to going on the trip it's individual ratings here as it's in this country which would be 28 ratings. Add Trinidad, that would be 29 since the whole experience in that country is counted as one rating.

[sweetpea]

From October 25th, 2007 to February 3rd, 2008 all ratable interactions are being recorded on the Fifth Administration (or fifth interval of ratings since this system is set up). I went to Trinidad on January 24th - Febuary 7th, which is within that time-zone. The trip got rated overall as an experience. Prior to going on the trip it's individual ratings here as it's in this country which would be 28 ratings. Add Trinidad, that would be 29 since the whole experience in that country is counted as one rating.

 

Ok, got it. 28 ratings came from before you left on your trip. For reasons unknown you do not rate individual interactions when out of the country

 

So let me now ask you this...

 

What do you consider a ratable interaction in your home country, which I believe is Canada..?

 

1) A girl smiles at you as you walk down the street

2) A woman gives you change in a convenience store and says have a nice day

3) Same woman, same words, but she smiles at you

4) A waitress in a restaurant takes your order, but her facial expression is not discernable as to any type of emotion

5) Same waitress, but she doesnt look happy when she takes your order

6) Same waitress, but she smiles at you when she asks for your order

7) Any of the above women give you their number after you ask them for it

 

Assume all women are a 3 on your attractiveness scale.

 

I am just trying to determine a rating scale threshold for analytical comparitability

[Luke Skywalker]

What do you consider a ratable interaction in your home country, which I believe is Canada..?

 

1) A girl smiles at you as you walk down the street

2) A woman gives you change in a convenience store and says have a nice day

3) Same woman, same words, but she smiles at you

4) A waitress in a restaurant takes your order, but her facial expression is not discernable as to any type of emotion

5) Same waitress, but she doesnt look happy when she takes your order

6) Same waitress, but she smiles at you when she asks for your order

7) Any of the above women give you their number after you ask them for it

 

Assume all women are a 3 on your attractiveness scale.

 

I am just trying to determine a rating scale threshold for analytical comparitability

 

As I have stated before, a name (necessary to have a score beside it), and a contact number are both prerequsites for being included in this system.

 

It's not scored until you actually try to pursue the first date or meeting and seeing where that goes.

 

Women do say 'yes', but it's the follow-up where things fall apart.

 

 

There is another element to that as well. If three names and numbers are taken from a source, then that source is rated as an experience by the average of the three scores, and further subtraction or increment based on the experience itself.

 

There is a work experience rating of zero, and an internet experience rating of negative ten (the lowest possible score). There are really 26 individual scores, 2 source experience scores, and one 'out of the country' experience score.

[sweetpea]

So you got 26 names and numbers from October 25, 2007 through February 7, 2008?

 

Thats 3.5 months, approximately 14 weeks, that's 2 names and numbers per week!

 

That's not too shabby there, Luke.

[Luke Skywalker]

A weak negative average score of - 1.3, or between -1 to -2 does not represent a disaster. It's a joke, almost a token negative score. You are right, definitely not shabby or the score would be much lower than that. The lesson is a joke too (i.e. not to tell a woman you don't know very well that you are leaving to go on a trip.) Since I dont go on trips often, the likelyhood again is slim.

[alatas]

Well, it's October 25th, 2006. This year in review between March 18, 2006 to October 25th, 2006.

 

Lessons learned:

 

- On a first date, never ask a girl how many guys she slept with, or ask about her sexual history, or ask any line of question that may portray her as a wh0re, as you may nuke your chances.

 

Luke...surely you must have realised that asking a girl stuff like that on a first date would virtually guarantee that that was your first and last date with her?

 

If a guy asked me those things on a first date...no matter how nice he was, I'd be outta there!!! It's far too personal a thing to ask on a first date.

[JadedStar]

ha ha, very funny. I guess there are no other people that have 'fictional worlds', imaginary friends, or any of that stuff.

 

Not since i was about eight Luke.

 

I have had some offbeat thoughts, but you have me beaten buddy! LOL

 

Luke, do you have OCD? These sound very much like things a person with OCD would do. The rituals and such.

[sweetpea]

Luke,

 

I just don't get how you can get 26 womens names and numbers, at the rate of two per week, and not ONE of them turns into a second date.

 

Do you call them after you get the number? Do you ask them out?

[JadedStar]

Yes, do you call them after you get the number and ask them out? Not trying to sound like an echo here to SweetPea but I am curious.

 

THat is a lot of phone numbers. But not one real date out of it?

 

You are not pulling our chain are you? Did you get these numbers by pretending to sell magazine subscriptions or those really large chocolate bars? Or with the intent of getting to know the lady further as in a date?

 

We're pulling for ya Luke, just trying to understand it more.

[sweetpea]

You are not pulling our chain are you? Did you get these numbers by pretending to sell magazine subscriptions or those really large chocolate bars?

 

I am guessing it's the National Walk for Cancer.

 

You get pages of names and numbers from that one.

[Luke Skywalker]

Luke,

 

I just don't get how you can get 26 womens names and numbers, at the rate of two per week, and not ONE of them turns into a second date.

 

Sigh. I can see this is really going under scrutiny and I'm going to have to go entry by entry on the negative scores. There aren't 26 negative scores though. There are 8 scores which are negative, the rest would be zeros or positive. The average of all the scores is negative though.

 

If we are dealing with the 8 negative scores, the break-down of such is as follows:

 

1) One of them I saw on a date, which I used to work with also as my morgage consultant, we went out on a lunch together, and I failed to follow up with her after that lunch and several months passed by. When I followed up with her I just got her answering machine and she didn't call me back.

Score is - 5. No lesson about that is registered. Partial contribution to negative score is acknowledged, hence it's -5 and not -10.

 

2) Another girl I got her number, but did not follow up with her properly until a few months had passed by. Score is -5. Partial contribution to negative score is acknowledge, hence it's -5 and not -10.

 

3) Another girl I meet from online on and set up a date. I wasn't able to go because I thought the weather was bad, but she got my email too late and waited 45 minutes for me. When I tried to reschedule she was uncooperative. Negative score of -8 recorded since the place of meeting was close to her place and she should have been more accomidating with respect to the weather.

 

This set a precedent whereby a registered entry online can just be a name and a commitment to go out with me, without getting a number.

 

4) Another girl with a low attraction power agreed to go out with me, but I don't know what I said back to her in correspondence but it appears she just lost interest and didn't reply back. -4 score recorded there.

 

5) Another girl appeared willing to go out with me, but I followed up over a few weeks afterwards, and it appeared that I lost her by that time. -5 score is recorded on that.

 

6) The latest girl I meet for coffee, and when I sent her an email the day after, she said that she enjoyed herself too, and would be available to go out within a week or two later. I had to go to Trinidad and sent her an email that I would be out of the country for two weeks. She didn't reply back to that email. Negative score of -6 recorded.

 

7) A girl I meet online for Christmas agreed to go out with me and she gave me her number to call. I called her number and got her answering machine, where I left her message wishing her a happy new year and giving her my number for her to call back. I then found out that her blocked me online, and she didn't return back my call - score of -8 recorded on that one.

 

Those are I guess the main negative scores that are placed down which I seem to have had a bad experience. Again, neutral or postive scores are not under scrutiny so I'm not going to go over them.

[sweetpea]

Tell me about some of the positives, Luke.

[Luke Skywalker]

Tell me about some of the positives, Luke.

 

Why not. You already know I rated the Trini-experience a +3.

Let's look at other individual cases.

 

 

1) An old friend from University in correspondence was very interested in seeing me before I went from Trinidad and felt dissappointed that I could not see her. Since she's still there as an old friend and seems sincere, I decided to rate her a +10, even though she is just a female friend.

 

2) A business associate is a Chinese girl who has a boyfriend, but she's very nice to me to invite me to go to a show with her, and when I went to Trinidad, she took care of my clients and was very honest and trustworthy. She didn't try to steal any business and I think there is a good business relationship.

It's good to know there are people in the world that you can trust. Positive ten rating.

 

3) There is a woman who is nice to me at a weight clinic I go to, and evidence is that there is an optional day for people to go which is not mandatory in the program, but she'll encourage me to go, or tell me when she is working there and invite me to come along to see her. Despite her other life, I feel a sense of connection coming from her with these gestures and feel special. A positve 2 score so far is recorded there.

 

I don't have her number, but because I know where she works and I see her, and I have her name, it qualifies as an entry.

 

That is it all the positive, the rest are neutral scores - zero rated.