Shajenko
-
Posts
35 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Videos
Blogs
Store
Everything posted by Shajenko
-
Yeah, this is great advice - if you never want to hear from her again. Women will not make the first move, you have to. Just say "We should get together some time" and hand her your cell phone. Tell her to put her number in your phone. If she objects in any way, just tell her "don't worry about it" to whatever she says and motion to put her number in again. If she refuses, just take your phone back, leave, and forget her. If she does put her number in your phone, call it immediately afterwards (in her presense), so that A) she'll have YOUR number, and B) you'll know whether she put her real number in or not. If it's fake, delete it and forget her.
-
Hey, I didn't say I was perfect. It's just that some women make it so easy to tell that they deserve it. Never once did I say "all women". Now who's the one putting words in whose mouth? That's because it's an abstract concept. And I DID supply a definition - punishing the guilty. This has nothing to do with the law - laws aren't for enforcing justice, they're for enforcing order. You'd do well to know the difference. Trust me, I used to be like the original poster. I never got any of that "positve force" from women when I was like him. I wised up.
-
A man who wants sex! Horrors!
-
Women to have sex with, for one.
-
Gets me what I want. Not when I'm convinced they're lying. "Gentle brush off" is a euphamism you used a few times. I called it what it really was - a lie. I'm not surprised you didn't like that. I find it funny when people think that I'm somehow "hiding" their words when I use the quote function - your reply is right up above mine! How am I misleading anybody about what you said?
-
You don't really believe any of that.
-
My morals say that justice should be served - people who deserve to be punished should be punished. And you can usually tell within a short amount of time if a woman is the type of woman who deserves that punishment. Sometimes they'll even tell stories about some loser they blew off with the techniques that have been previously discussed here.
-
Pffft. No, they really don't. They usually have to hear the liar tell a lie that directly contradicts something they know to be a fact to catch all but the most obvious of liars. They've done studies on this kind of thing, and most people fail miserably.
-
Canadians are northern devils. You know when it snows? That's when they're about to strike. The invasion is coming!
-
Don't worry about me. I'm doing much better now that I'm lying to women. And no, I don't think that makes me a good person, or it's acceptable - I just think that they have it coming.
-
Ah, subtle manipulation - I love it! Don't worry - there are a great many successful misogynists.
-
Why is that surprising? If you get nothing but scorn and contempt from the opposite sex, you will hate them. For me, hate is a strong word. Condescension is more appropriate. Treating them like they are children does wonders - they respond well to it.
-
I see, you think lying is fine. That tells us what kind of person you are. What's reinforcing my negative mindset towards women is women's behavior. Such as your own.
-
Yeah yeah, I know - lying is honorable, black is white, war is peace. Whatever. You tell yourself whatever you have to to soothe your conscience.
-
Just think of it this way: Women tend to be cowardly. They don't want confrontation purely for selfish reasons, though they will try to rationalize it as somehow being in the guy's favor too. Basically, take anything other than a "yes" as a no. Don't waste your time on them any longer. Don't bother speaking to them again. Do a full on NEXT - make no contact with them, and politely but quickly get out of all contact they initiate with you. Never do them any favors.
-
Or, like with most people, it will never happen. True love is a myth, not a promise. In the real world, you can either hope that good things will happen to you, or you can take steps to make them happen. The wiser course of action is the second.
-
Tell that to a guy who's 40 and still waiting for that time to come. I've spoken to them, and I dare you to tell one of them this to his face.
-
It's not actually a dating advice book at all. It's an autobiography, detailing his foray into a subculture dealing with picking women up. And he doesn't actually put it in that great a light.
-
stark future for the single male posters in this forum?
Shajenko replied to dlplight99999's topic in Dating Advice
Careful, some people get a bit obsessed and then things turn bad. -
stark future for the single male posters in this forum?
Shajenko replied to dlplight99999's topic in Dating Advice
There are various things you can do to improve your luck with women, at least short term. If you read Neil Strauss's recent book "The Game", you'll see that there is a sort of underground community that has dedicated itself into figuring out those "buttons", for lack of a better term, that you have to activate in women to make them attracted. They've got it down to a science, or rather several different sciences, as there are many different methods. Anyway, you can look into it at the website link removed. It's highly disorganized, but there's a lot of information there. -
When I think of the 1800's, I think of company towns, sweatshops, no worker rights, etc. That's how most people lived, rather than the upper classes who lived such a "proper" existence. Either that or they lived in the Wild West, where manners and proper hygiene were rare. Anyway, before maybe 20 or so years ago, men paid and women didn't for very practical reasons - either the man had to pay for everything, or there was no date because the woman couldn't afford it.
-
Those dollars add up. Say you go on a few dozen dates. Let's say you go someplace fairly cheap and only pay say $10 a person for a meal. Along with the money you'd spend on yourself, which is probably more than you'd spend on a meal if you stayed home and ate, you get to treat somebody who is a near stranger, who is probably not even going to be appreciative of it - they'll just expect it, and possibly demand it. If you go on dozens and dozens of first dates, you're spending quite a bit of cash on women you'll never see again, and they get free meals instead. It can make men pretty resentful, especially when the women are making as much or even more money than yourself. Now, if you're claiming that men who don't make much money don't deserve to date, then just say you're judging men based on their income and wealth in which case you can be properly labelled a gold digger. Otherwise, I'd suggest you rethink your criteria. Not to me. My family is valuable to me. People I care about are valuable to me. Strangers and aquaintences are not. They may be wonderful human beings, but I don't know that, and I can't know that from very little interaction with them. It may sound harsh to you, but it's true. I'd be willing to bet that people you've never met before and who you will never interact with simply don't matter too much to you, beyond the little amount they matter simply by virtue of being human. I'd also bet you wouldn't trust them with anything serious, because they might not deserve it. This is simply human. You're not going to make big sacrifices for random people. You won't give up your job to make sure somebody in the third world has a job. Doing so would be foolish. Similarly, I'm not willing to sacrifice for random women I meet. It's only sensible. Anyone I meet could be a thief, or even a murderer. It's why it's not considered wise to pick up hitchhikers.
-
How do I know you're a very valuable person? I just met you recently. You could be very bitter, or a psycho, or any number of other things. You seem to be saying that men are obligated to spend money on an unproven person, while you yourself should be free to wait until you know for sure that he's worth your cash.
-
Let me get this straight... I go out with a woman for the first time. Now, this woman is almost certainly a virtual stranger - all I really know about her is what she looks like, her outward demeanor, and maybe a few minutes of prior conversation at most. Now, this date is a chance for both of us to see if we like each other. I might very well decide that I don't want to see her ever again, or I might just decide I might want to see her again, but I'm not crazy about her. And I'm just expected to pay and pay and pay with no reciprocation at all? Too hell with that. If she decides she doesn't want to see me any more because I won't pay her way, she's done me a favor. I don't get along with gold diggers.
-
Why is it that Men almost always have to ask Women out
Shajenko replied to thefoot's topic in Dating Advice
Wait, you're saying that women are intentionally ambiguous, and it's not HER fault when the guy doesn't read her mind? Sounds like she should own up to her own failures.