annie24 Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 And guess what? The US isn't #1!!! link removed It's an interesting slideshow. Brief, and you'll learn some geography and why marriages around the world aren't as prone to last in certain areas.... Link to comment
RayKay Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 Interesting Annie. I did know in Puerto Rico for example it was very common to be in your early to mid-20s and already be divorced. Neat seeing the causes behind the stats. It seems they do have many common factors though too, such as youth and financial situations. Link to comment
Sylph Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 Isle of Man is number four!? But that place is tiny... I can only imagine what must be going on there. Link to comment
Q10 Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 Yeah really interesting, thanks for sharing Annie Link to comment
DN Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 The other thing that is not taken into account is the fact that many people in the USA are in common-law relationships and the statistics do not reflect those break-up rates. Link to comment
CarterJonas Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 In the UK the divorce rate is something like 1 in 2. Link to comment
Sylph Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 Not according to that poll, I mean it's got the Isle of Man there so it's not excluding areas of the British Isles. Link to comment
RandomAdvisor Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 I think that poll is calculating people who are divorced as a percentage of the population, and not what percentage of marriages end in divorce. There's a big difference between those. Link to comment
Daddy Bear Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 not that these figures apply to any one person's case anyway, but wouldn't knowing which countries had the lowest rate of remarriage be at least as statistically relevant, if not more so? Link to comment
CarterJonas Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 I think the link means per 1000 / per year. I meant over a lifetime. Link to comment
RandomAdvisor Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 I think the over a lifetime statistic is more revealing. Link to comment
novaseeker Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 That's more informative than the per 1000 people statistic, which strikes me as a very odd way of measuring divorces, really. Link to comment
Tylin Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 Crude statistics usually aren't very informative, but they're great for skewing numbers to make things look a certain way. Refined divorce rate statistics generally measure the percentage of divorce per 1,000 married women that are 15 and older. No use counting the children, the priests, cows, chickens, etc. Link to comment
Daddy Bear Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 it goes without saying that results vary by individual, but priests and chickens aside (please!), i still think that divorce rate minus remarriage rate should be considered more relevant than the former by itself. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now