Jump to content

Ms Darcy

Platinum Member
  • Posts

    31,715
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    54

Ms Darcy last won the day on April 7 2014

Ms Darcy had the most liked content!

About Ms Darcy

  • Birthday 07/16/1981

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Ms Darcy's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

925

Reputation

  1. I'm very sorry to hear about your cat. Is it bad that I have mourned the death of an animal more than the break up of an ex. That was so sad to hear. And cats definitely do mourn.
  2. Perhaps what is getting lost is this. Moreso that incompatibility reared its ugly head again - whether one wants to label the ex or not.
  3. I'm sorry to hear it didn't work out this time. It sounds like things had improved in many ways and that you guys were both making an earnest effort. Hope you feel better soon.
  4. Yeah. But I actually think that beyond personal experience, data and reading is really important. Because I think it's important to understand, systemically, how social status works. For example, in a *purely* capitalist system, you will always have significant amounts of poverty. As you have hierarchical work structures, president/ceo, VPs, managers, line workers ... the people at the bottom will make much less. And if companies have the ability to choose how to distribute wealth, they are more inclined to pay the top more and the bottom less. It's just the way it works without some level of government and/or social intervention. And in a *purely* (I mean unregulated) capitalist system, monopolies can crush competition and drive up the prices of everyday items (food, housing, clothes, internet, phones, transportation, etc. etc). So what you get is people who produce more wealth for the country, make less, and have a higher cost of living. There's no amount of "pulling yourself up by your bootstraps" that gets you out of that. It's simple math, sadly. That's happened in part in the US. Wages have remained stagnant since 1973 yet the cost of living has skyrocketed. / Btw, the vast majority of fraud in the health care system is due from medical providers (doctors, hospital workers) and organized fraud (collusion between medical providers, lawyers, so-called patients). So, in terms of what is most material financially to total losses from the system, paying attention to potential billing schemes pays much more dividends than focusing on poor folks who may be cheating the system.
  5. This whole conversation, to me, highlights the failure of the education system. Generally, people are brought up to do rote work but not taught how to think critically and how to question things. I think it's nice that people believe anyone can "pull themselves up by their bootstraps" and become successful. But there is actually quite a lot of empirical evidence that states very clearly that generally a person's social position in adulthood is a mix of institutional factors (outside of your control ... like the country you were born in and the family you were born into) and personal factors (inside your control). Fundamentally, I think people tend to look at the poor with disdain and the rich/wealthy with adulation. As an example, consider mortgage fraud. Mortgage fraud happens throughout the social spectrum. But when poorer people commit fraud, the losses range from $500 - $200,000. When wealthy folks (usually within corporations) commit white collar fraud, the median losses range from $10,000,000 to $500,000,000. (Think of the 2008/2009 crash in the US.) I don't see people admonishing wealthy folks for sometimes making bad choices? ( ). And I think it's because people view being wealthy as the END GOAL. Well, you are good or smart or deserving because you are rich - no matter how you got there or what you've done once you are there. I would encourage people to separate their own beliefs from facts. We live in a day and age where people use their beliefs to justify their actions. When, ideally, facts would helps drive beliefs and actions. I humbly suggest that we need to read more and really understand how wealth works in the modern world, so I would suggest reading:
  6. I agree. I don't think just anyone can learn to be a lawyer, a doctor, a software engineer, a CPA, a pharmacist etc etc just going through courses. Lots of people try very hard and don't cut it in the end. But I think if someone's willing to play the game, act a certain way, play a certain role, and do so with resilience, they'll get the interpersonal skill side.
  7. I think our own experiences color our perceptions, and that's OK. It makes for interesting discussion. Just a couple of quick thoughts. It took my husband 7 years of higher education to gain the technical skills to get where he is. It took him about a year (in the past couple of years) to get to social/interpersonal skills to get to the senior level. Similarly, it's taken me about 6 years of college/grad school for the foundational skills to think forward in my industry (and to be able to apply those principles to similar industries). I've never had much of an issue with interpersonal stuff. (I actually think going to school and getting involved in extra curricular activities that mimic the professional environment throughout the years from high school to college to grad school has been incredibly helpful in teaching me interpersonal skills). Mostly, I've had to focus more on not taking things personally and having the confidence not to stick around in an environment that wasn't the best for me personally. I think if someone needs as much as or more than 6/7 years to learn those professional interpersonal skills, they aren't going to go anywhere in their career. That's what I mean about "harder" to learn certain technical things. In terms of work ethic, interestingly, I think work ethic is strongly aligned with a) how passionate people feel about the mission and b) how respected they feel. I did work on a political campaign where you had young people working 10/12/14 hours a day 6 days a week for a couple of years. After that experience, I can NEVER write off young folks as lazy. But I would imagine much of that is because they really believed in what they were doing and they were working in a hope-filled environment where they had a lot of freedom to lead and innovate. I couldn't do stick with it like they did because I needed a salary. Oh, yes, they worked 60/70 hour weeks for many months FOR FREE. I would also add, it was an odd environment because it was very happy and encouraging. We were all poor and like a family. We were all working towards the same goal and took the lead on our own roles. It was somewhat similar to Agile methodology, if folks are familiar, with "sprints" to reach a specific goal. And we had "parties" and celebrations for reaching goals. The manager actually didn't "do" any work except to delegate tasks, check on status, eliminate obstacles (e.g. find money to fund a task) and celebrate successes. (She was essentially the Project Manager but we called her the cheerleader.) At first, I thought her position was an incredible waste. Over time, as I saw the productivity of everyone else, I thought of her as the most important person on the team. So, I'm more inclined to think there are just different profiles of millennials working in different industries.
  8. That's a fair point. I also think it's fairly straightforward to teach people communication skills and good phone manners. It's not as straightforward to teach people how to code, how to automate manual processes, how to innovate technically. There are some really great articles on this, which I have found to be amazingly on point for my own team. Essentially, the notion is that millennials tend to have an entrepreneurial basis/motivations for action/change - which drives innovation. / Anyway, I don't think having an entrepreneurial spirit justifies an entitled attitude. But I do think it does show that the older generations have a far greater dependence on and need for the younger ones in ways they might not like to admit.
  9. I am totally biased, but what I have noticed ... millennials are far more technologically and technically savvy than older generations. I feel like my boss is an exception. But, generally, I have noticed that many of the barriers to progress and innovation in my field are the older folks who cannot stop thinking in a more "manual" way versus "automated." It's a real problem. Younger folks are constantly learning new things and I feel like, where I am, the older folks insist on doing things in the most inefficient, least effective ways. So, rightly or wrongly, I feel like many resent working for a boss, who's only in his/her position because they have been around for 20 years plus, when they know they know far more.
  10. I'm just happening upon this journal. These days, with all the drama in the world, sometimes I like to escape to melodramatic romance novels with happy endings. This journal sort of reminds me of that in a way - entertaining and light. And written with swift fluffiness. But as I've gone on, I've gone from thinking "what a fabulous life" to "what a sad life." Maybe you are very happy. I hope so and you are just writing for entertainment. But wow girl, you seem very very sad. Maybe I'm wrong. And kick me if I am. I forget where you said it, but you said something about being a witness to the world and not apart of it. Certainly, you have an anachronistic style. But hopefully you can find something meaningful and purposeful to go for. Maybe go into writing. Your writing is very entertaining.
  11. Yeah, I don't think anyone should be throwing themselves at anyone else. But clues and hints ... This situation doesn't really count since it's not going anywhere. But if there is a someone else in the future, I would advise more of a middle ground.
  12. I didn't take a passive approach in dating. I figured out what I wanted and acted accordingly. The other benefit of that is that men FEEL when you are interested. And it helps fuel their interest. It's kind of like putting your foot on the accelerator. If things in the car are working, the car will speed up. In other words the relationship will go forward. On the other hand, if your foot isn't on the accelerator (or if there's obvious lack of interest from the woman), then it's no surprise the car overall slows down to a stop. It doesn't really matter in this case though.
  13. I'm not completely sure it's a sign of anything to be going slow with someone you are not that into. Well, a sign of anything other than it's easier to go slow when you are not that into someone.
  14. I echo what WL and Faraday have said. I think men and women of every age have this problem - dating without some healing from being dumped. And in the end, one or both often get very hurt.
×
×
  • Create New...