Jump to content

Manuka Honey?


Recommended Posts

Hi Amazing Pet Owners!

 

Just wondering what everyone's thoughts are for using Manuka Honey on small wounds on cats and dogs?

 

I did a veterinary related degree and spent a lot of time with work experience in practice. I have seen many vets push medicines for "money" instead or using alternative natural treatments.

 

I know some vets and rescue centers use it as a valid treatment but very rare to find those that advise this.

 

I am not crazy and would never ignore going to the vet for something serious.

 

I read an interesting article about a women who was prosecuted for using it on her cat and banned for having pets for a year! She literally ignored her cat's condition which lead to amputation of his leg and subsequently had to be put down which was sad. All this could of been avoided if she seeked medical care for him.

 

So it's given some negative light to using it as manuka honey as a treatment.

 

Let me know if you have used it and how your pet has got on with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never done it or heard of anyone doing it... I don't recommend it for cats though as they would just end up licking it off and don't tolerate or digest it well. And couldn't imagine the sticky mess it would make in their fur, especially my on my RagDoll lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the research on this is only regarding people as far as I know. You shouldn't actually put it directly on the wound, but rather via bandage.

 

As for animals like dogs and cats, it's actually risky to use because honey may be toxic to them if they ingest it. Some may be more tolerant than others to it, but if they lick it off or chew through the bandage, you can have a whole different problem on your hands.

 

When it comes to wound care, as much as I like alternative medicines, quite frankly there are some very simple good, long time established ointments that work like a charm and I see zero reason to mess with honey. Most are also available at your local feed store, so not expensive to buy and you don't need a vet to "push" prescription strength stuff for minor things. That said, if your animal is injured enough to require veterinary care, then trust your vet to provide you what you actually need to ensure your pet's health. Most vets I know don't actually "push" unnecessary meds on your critter. If you believe that yours is doing so, change your vet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never once heard it heal wounds. But I got some recently after my doctor told me to get it. I took it recently for a cold that I was getting that normally last a week or so. The next day, no sign of the cold. Very weird. Took it with my tea. Doesn't hurt to check it out for a sore throat or cold.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I have seen many vets push medicines for "money" instead or using alternative natural treatments.
What, do you think your veterinarian is getting a commission for every "unnatural" medication they provide? They're not administering medication to make a buck. They're doing it because they went to school 8 years and, even for veterinarians, likely completed a 3+ year residency, and keep up with the published literature in order to best understand what evidence-based medication is appropriate. In fact, pharma's been historically at odds with veterinarian practices around medications precisely because they're not conducive to a nice profit margin like human medicine's have historically been (even then, between anti-kickback and Stark laws, your physician likely isn't making a dime off the prescription they write you). Besides, if they really were in it to make a buck without regard to Mittens' health, why not just buy a jar of honey or whatever other "natural" medicine for whichever owners who insist on it?

 

I know some vets and rescue centers use it as a valid treatment but very rare to find those that advise this.
I'd probably stick to the consensus among the professionals, then.

 

There are numerous topical and relatively non-intrusive treatments out there which are scientifically supported where I don't think it's worth p*ssing off your cat sticking its fur with honey even if there were an empirical benefit.

 

Honestly, with all the jackassery going on with folks who are oblivious to the fact our pets' physiology are often astronomically different than our own (not saying you're among them), I think it's socially irresponsible for any one of us to suggest treating them on your own even if some among us might be competent to some minor degree or if some ideas would most likely, at worst, be relatively benign. If it's superficial enough not to require a vet, then there's a good chance you're doing more harm than good messing with it. If it's serious enough to need something done, then you should be taking your pet in.

Edited by j.man
Link to post
Share on other sites

Found it fasinating after reading the article about a women being prosecuted by the RSPCA for using the honey. With the article making it sound like it's bad to use. When in fact it's her actions of not seeking veterinary care was the issue and not the honey itself. As the RSPCA use manuka honey in their practices.

 

It does work wonders to heal wounds. Was advised so for myself after surgery by the doctor.

 

I've seen it also used in veterinary practice. Espicially veterinary osteopeadic surgery on open wounds while bandaged. Accelerated healing greatly due to its antibacterial properties.

 

Was curious what everyones elses thoughts were.

 

I'm very fortunate to have a great veterinary that doesn't push for unnecessary treatment. Next visit I'll question him about manuka honey in general. He is very holistic in his approach but remains a remarkable vet.

 

Unfortunately a lot of veterinary practices do cut corners when it comes to holding back on finances or making money.

 

Awful story about one veterinary who bought incredibly cheap cannulas. Saved one third instead of buying the decent ones. Anyway he is fitting the cannual for the euthanasia to be adminstrated. As they were not high quality he was unable to insert it into the vein. It took over 5 attempts! All this while the owners are there clearly distressed. Could have all been avoided if he bought the more expensive ones. It took ages to put the dog to sleep. Distressing for the owners and the dog.

 

The client is still charged the same even if he was using the correct cannuals. So they are essentially making money as a practice.

 

It wasn't even the fact he was a newly qualified vet. He had been in practice for over 35 years.

 

Sadly it is a business and like most businesses they will do the best to increase their profits.

 

I have even seen them use cheaper alternatives in pain relief after surgery on animals. Again clinets charged the same! All very regulated practices too.

 

 

So that's why when they push for the high steroid creams and ointments. Makes me wonder are the alternatives really that bad?

 

As honey is not toxic to animals. May cause an upset stomach if eaten in excess but the same would happen to us too.

 

Was an interesting find to be fair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What "wonders?" Do you have an AJVR publication (or Aussie equivalent) that gives credit to these wonders of honey treating house pets?

 

You can wonder all you want. Fact is animal medicine should be taken as seriously as human medicine-- or at least as close to it as it reasonably can be. The wonderings and anecdotes of one woman or even the scientifically unsupported opinion of a flower child holistic veterinarian should not frame medical treatment protocols. If any one of us were to go in with a gash only for the doctor to pull out a jar of honey, I pray to the God I don't even believe in that he gets smacked so hard his shoes and stethoscope fall right off.

 

I think it's a huge slap in the face to veterinarians who devote upwards of 12 years of their lives being educated and trained for what's typically a pretty meager salary compared to most other fields of similar educational / training requirements and professional responsibilities to apathetically attribute their work to "sadly" being purposed for a profit. I'm not sure what vets you're seeing rolling up to the clinic in a Rolls-Royce, but your standard GP clinic or animal hospital isn't operating at nearly the scale of their human counterparts. They aren't being equivalently compensated for comparable human procedures and operations, nor do they have the economy of scale with the multi-trillion dollar medical equipment and pharmaceutical industry to take advantage of. Unless you'd like to contradict yourself and hope they sell themselves to whom you perceive to be the devil, these clinics are and likely for the foreseeable future will be hoping to somehow simply stay in the black. Fact is you have no idea why they're skimping $0.25 per cannula, but I can near guarantee the guy wasn't sticking an animal six times just so he could see some dollar signs.

 

I don't know what degree you have, if you're a vet tech, whatever. But it's sounding like it's probably best you stay in your lane. There's a certain level of nuance that comes with effective administration which probably doesn't lend itself to folks who consider pouring honey on cats and dogs without supportive research and literature to be a satisfactory practice in lieu of established medicine.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Jman and also believe that you find a doctor you feel you can trust - and if you believe your doctor is in it for profit and not your best interest or your pet's/child's/loved one then you are seeing the wrong doctor. On an analogous note I've seen so many on my facebook mom groups post all the conspiracy theories about flu shots while people -including children -are already dying this year from flu complications. Or almost dying. I'm not saying it's "right" to get vaccinated -my point is that this fear-mongering and push for everything holistic because of big-bad-medicine is too far to the other extreme (no I am not in any medical field at all). Sure, there are alternatives- honey, hot tea, and I've heard elderberry oil is good for certain ailments (never tried it) - and certainly all the natural prevention -staying hydrated, trying to eat cleanly, etc. But to paint doctors with such a broad negative brush such that you'd consider honey for something like wound care (unless your trained vet recommended it) - I just think that's doing disservice to the care of an animal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi J.man,

 

There is supportive scientific articles out there based on Manuka honey's remarkable properties. For both human and veterinary medicine. They can easily be found on any rearch journal website.

 

It prevents the use of antibiotic topical treatments as we all know is widely used and increasing bacterial resistance.

 

For the record I am not saying I go around and smear honey over my pets in hope it makes them feel better from the "magic" of honey. I'm not a fool and would always seek profesional medical care when it comes to my pets. As I would so the same for myself or any family member. As you are right veterinary medicine should be treated the same as human medicine.

 

That said medical grade honey is sold in veterinary practices! Same as what you would find in your local pharamacy just without the hyped up prices from a vet practice.

 

I'm not saying go to your local green grocers and pick up some honey and go play vet. But if it's the same being sold for use in practice. Then why not use it? It is not as widely known as your conventional medical oinments.

 

Happens to be cheaper than your steriod based and antibiotic based oinments. Let's face it steriod creams can be so damaging to skin.

 

Years ago our German Shepherd as a puppy experienced eczema. The vet who was not a holistic vet suggested instead or the harsh chemicals in steroid creams that we should go to the pharmacy and get nappy rash cream for his eczema. We didn't do it because it was cheaper - we went as we was advised by a trained veterinarian. Guess what it treated his eczema amazingly! Happened to be a fraction of the price too.

 

You do get decent vets who are litterally in it for the aminals. Like the women we met all those years ago. But you also get vets who do think of the dollar signs sadly.

 

Now being a pet owner I take full financial responsibility for my pets. It's part of the parcel. I would never begrudge treatment for them on the grounds of money. That said if there is a more natural alernative then why not explore it? Heck even if it costa more who cares if it has a better overall outcome for your pets health.

 

The vet I had mentioned regarding the cannulas. I had spoke with the practice nurse and even she said he has been cutting corners for years now and the care he is offering to animals has greatly decreased on these grounds. He owned the practice so his budget cuts directly lined his pockets. So yes I do believe he was doing it for the "dollar signs".

 

GP surgeries are regulated more than veterinary practices. Meaning veterinary practice owners can get away with this and more! If you ever get an itemized bill from your vet after an operation, a lot of the times a lot of those items have never been used but you are stilled charged for!

 

I am not saying all veterinary practices operate this way. But I have some across some that have. Which is why it is so important to be with a vet you can genuinely trust. Like I have and many others have fortunately.

 

I was merely asking for opinions of using Manuka honey. I was not disregarding the veterinary profession and saying I'll go against veterinary advice for my own pets.

 

No, I am not a vet tech. I never said my degree would equipt me for adminstrating or playing "vet". It has given me a basic understanding of veterinary reseach. So I will stay in my "lane" as I've never gone against medical advise from professionals for my own pets. Or even advised others of alternatives got their own pets.

 

I was asking for people's personal experience with it. And curious if it was more widely known as a treatment.

 

That said I have has been involved in veterinary related research especially veterinary pharamacolgy.

 

I know the vast difference from humans to other species. So know that I can't overlap research from human medicine directly to animals.

 

I did my masters under the vice principal of my veterinary school. I was talking to him about the discovery of a very effective drug for hypertension. He was explaining that despite it being an overall better drug than the mainstream drug on offer. He said it wouldn't get very far in practice as it's very expensive for practice's to use. So that said vets tend to not be adminstrating the "best" medication at times due to expense. Which is very similar to human medicine.

 

So them not offering something natural doesn't mean it's not good. As sometimes things on their shelves aren't exactly the best medication on offer either.

 

Just keep that all in mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree with Jman and also believe that you find a doctor you feel you can trust - and if you believe your doctor is in it for profit and not your best interest or your pet's/child's/loved one then you are seeing the wrong doctor. On an analogous note I've seen so many on my facebook mom groups post all the conspiracy theories about flu shots while people -including children -are already dying this year from flu complications. Or almost dying. I'm not saying it's "right" to get vaccinated -my point is that this fear-mongering and push for everything holistic because of big-bad-medicine is too far to the other extreme (no I am not in any medical field at all). Sure, there are alternatives- honey, hot tea, and I've heard elderberry oil is good for certain ailments (never tried it) - and certainly all the natural prevention -staying hydrated, trying to eat cleanly, etc. But to paint doctors with such a broad negative brush such that you'd consider honey for something like wound care (unless your trained vet recommended it) - I just think that's doing disservice to the care of an animal.

 

Completely agree when it comes to vaccines.

 

Some awful stories of how parents have lost children for not vaccinating against measles, mumps and rubella.

 

In the 90's the MMR vaccine had a lot of negative press. A lot of parents opting against it and some still do to this say.

 

It's sad that literally lives have been lost for opting against vaccination.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Completely agree when it comes to vaccines.

 

Some awful stories of how parents have lost children for not vaccinating against measles, mumps and rubella.

 

In the 90's the MMR vaccine had a lot of negative press. A lot of parents opting against it and some still do to this say.

 

It's sad that literally lives have been lost for opting against vaccination.

 

I was talkinng specifically about the flu shot not the childhood vaccines because each year there are deaths from the flu and the conspiracy theories and lack of trust in one's own physician is a real shame.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I was talkinng specifically about the flu shot not the childhood vaccines because each year there are deaths from the flu and the conspiracy theories and lack of trust in one's own physician is a real shame.

 

It's not actually readily available over here unfortunately the general flu vaccine.

 

It's something only suggested for those with other health issues or the elderly.

 

Didn't realize parents refuse it on those grounds too. It is a shame.

Link to post
Share on other sites
It's not actually readily available over here unfortunately the general flu vaccine.

 

It's something only suggested for those with other health issues or the elderly.

 

Didn't realize parents refuse it on those grounds too. It is a shame.

 

Just meant as an example as I wrote.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know about this honey but agree with j.man on may counts from trashing doctors, the fda and veterinarians as scammers who are out to get you and your money. Also that they are all in bed with 'Big Pharma'. Or that people devote decades of their of their lives studying and running around all night in scrubs, just for fun. But, hey, I'm a scientist, not a TV quack..

Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't know about this honey but agree with j.man on may counts from trashing doctors, the fda and veterinarians as scammers who are out to get you and your money. Also that they are all in bed with 'Big Pharma'. Or that people devote decades of their of their lives studying and running around all night in scrubs, just for fun. But, hey, I'm a scientist, not a TV quack..

 

I have not trashed doctors or veterinarians what so ever.

 

I mentioned some amazing veterinarians that I have met in my life.

 

Like all professions there are more sincere people than others! Same goes for veterinary.

 

They are not all pushing "drugs" for no reason. Just was saying some do.

 

Like the whole "perscription diets". Some have no benefit to your pet and actually some "over the counter feeds" actually can have the same effect. This in it's self has been advised by veterinarians I've come across! Yes those people who have dedicated 12 years of their life suggesting better alternatives.

 

I've been in a practice with a veterinarian who suggested an official website to buy the medication cheaper for the owner. Like I said there are decent vets. Who do it for the animal and aren't all about the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Seems to me you are trashing quite a number of vets and seem to have a more than typical amount of distrust for the profession.

 

I was not trashing vets what so ever.

 

I have worked very closely with them in the past. What they do is remarkable.

 

I was starting some genuine stories I have observed of some not so professional vets. Doesn't mean I am painting them all with the same brush!

 

I was merely stating to j.man how it is run as a business. As it essentially is a business. There is a whole module in veterinary medicine which is "phamacetical business" then one towards the end of the pre-clincal years relating to the "business and management of vetrinary practices".

 

It's honestly no different if you look at any other business behind the scenes you will see them cutting corners all the time.

 

I was merely talking about something that is offered in veterinary practices for use on animals. Ranging from cats and dogs to horses!

 

Search for veterinary based Manuka honey you will find topical oinments to shampoo for animals with dermititis.

 

With scientific literature to support it.

 

So to be told to "stay in my lane" was valid as I've never gone against professional medical advice. But to be accused of trashing vets is not true. As I was stating stories of some vets that have been awful in the past.

 

I also shared stories of some amazing vets. Who also don't agree with over marked prices because it's a "veterinary" product. When there are genuine alternatives that have been proven to work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If my vet, that I have known for years, that has taken care of my last 4 cats, were to suggest that I use honey on their wound I would trust his advice. So far he never has and indeed advises against such things as a general rule. With regards to the scientific literature... I am very cautious and skeptical of the sources of these things. So many articles and documentaries are simply conspiracy theories and are filled with biased and downright false information. People are self-diagnosing and self-medicating themselves, their families and their animals with disastrous results.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, that's nonsense. It's malpractice to "cut corners". However any quack or supplement sales are not subject to the same scrutiny or oversight and therefore they are all about profits and snake oil rather than the real practice of ethically taking care of human and animal health. Agree with maew that these types of unfounded conspiracy theories prey on people looking for magic bullets and often with disastrous results.

It's honestly no different if you look at any other business behind the scenes you will see them cutting corners all the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Unfortunately, that's nonsense. It's malpractice to "cut corners". However any quack or supplement sales are not subject to the same scrutiny or oversight and therefore they are all about profits and snake oil rather than the real practice of ethically taking care of human and animal health. Agree with maew that these types of unfounded conspiracy theories prey on people looking for magic bullets and often with disastrous results.

 

It is a business at the end of the day.

 

We have a veterinarian board in this country and not all practices are required to be approved by this board. So it is perfectly legal for practices to run and not have that board seal of approval.

 

So unlike GPs that are strictly regulated there are practices that are no subject to the same scrutiny. So they are being run like a business.

 

There are times you will get a decent vet who will put the animal first. Which is brilliant band the way it should be.

 

I think to avoid sub-standard care all practices should be under the same regulations. But unfortunately they are not. As a pet owner it is out responsibility to look for the "approved" practices. Which I do! As my pets health is incredibly important to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. Never heard of a country where a DVM and a license are not required to have a veterinary practice.. Sounds like the 1800s wild west where the farrier doubled as the horse doctor.

We have a veterinarian board in this country and not all practices are required to be approved by this board. So it is perfectly legal for practices to run and not have that board seal of approval.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was referring to licensed physicians and veterinarians. It's not just a "business" because at least in my country you take certain oaths (so do attorneys). So for many (meaning who charge for their services -not referring to pro bono or volunteer situations) it's both a business and a licensed profession - and of course businesses should be ethical but professionals also have licenses/other requirements to "do no harm" etc. There are unethical people everywhere. You are painting with a fairly broad brush with your negative spin on veterinarians. I would not go to any doctor who was not licensed in his/her field or specialty. And of course I do my due diligence.

 

And yes if my doctor recommended honey I would try it since I trust my doctor and my child's doctor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Medical professionals have to earn a living like everyone else, but when they are remunerated for their services it's scamming? Unfortunately licensed educated professionals are scamming and people putting honey on pets is not scamming seems to be convoluted logic.

I was merely stating to j.man how it is run as a business. As it essentially is a business. There is a whole module in veterinary medicine which is "phamacetical business" then one towards the end of the pre-clincal years relating to the "business and management of vetrinary practices".

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if a licensed professional wants to stay in business he or she has to operate with the appropriate level of ethics and integrity. Of course it's a business and of course there are profits involved and just because it is a business doesn't mean that the person would make any unethical or immoral decisions with respect to her patients/ clients. Of course money motivates business people. And business people know that if they prioritize profits over ethical behavior their business will ultimately suffer. And of course most people are motivated too by an internal sense of what is right and ethical and moral and act on that in their business dealings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are all making it seem like I'm saying all veterinarians are corrupt.

 

Never did I say that what so ever.

 

I was stating incidences I've seen first hand!

 

You have all been very fortunate to have only ever met incredibly professional people. Whether that be vets, doctors or even lawyers.

 

Any profession you look into will have a few individuals that will cut corners for personal gain.

 

I have friends that are trainee vets that have seen similar situations in practice that I've mentioned and they are shocked too.

 

Not to say it's all bad as they have also have had very enriching experiences from other incredibly lovely vets. So have I for that matter.

 

Yes all licensed vets and vet nurses take an oath and should abide to it.

 

I was also talking about general standards for the practices in general.

 

In my country obviously all practices are lisenced. But not all of them are acredited from our regulatory body for veterinary surgeons. This requires setting standards and carrying out regular assessments, which promote and maintain the highest standards of veterinary care.

 

For the record I have never ever seen the things I've mentioned in one of those practices.

 

Yes it's a pet owners choice which practice they go to. I would only ever go to one that is accredited myself.

 

I have also seen those that are not acredited the same high standard of care as those that are.

 

That said regardless of accreditation I should expect to see the same high standard regardless due to the oath they make. Not always the case sadly.

 

It's some of the ones that aren't accredited that are able to get away with treating it more like a business. Essentially letting their overall standards slip. It would go unnoticed as they are not rigoursly checked like those with the "golden stamp".

 

I never came on here to insult the veterinary profession or undermine it.

 

I shared some experiences I witnessed first hand but never said all veterinary practices are that way. I am not painting all veterinarians to be the bad or the enemy.

 

I literally questioned about people's views on Manuka honey as a treatment.

 

It's sold in veterinary practices. Doesn't make it hokum.

 

One of the leading veterinarians in the UK uses it with some brilliant outcomes. So he is an advocate for this honeys healing properties.

 

In fact I've googled a lot into this yesterday. There are many other forums with people singing it's praises for their pets.

 

Just because something is not widely known doesn't make it bad.

 

Anyway for those of you that are pet owners and interested in this honey. Ask your vets about it next time you visit them.

 

I know I will ask at my next visit. As I would not use something without a liscenced veterinarian's advice.

 

Just because it's not conventional doesn't mean it is not benificial to your pets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...