Seymore Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 You will remain anonymous, and a post is not necessary, but do so if you feel like it. Just vote. Be HONEST! Link to comment
laisla Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 9/10 looks is still really high. i would choose someone with 9/10 looks and 10/10 personality over 10/10 looks and less personality. Link to comment
dragon lady Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 9/10 looks is still really high. i would choose someone with 9/10 looks and 10/10 personality over 10/10 looks and less personality. Same as me. I'd even rather 4/10 looks if it were 10/10 personality. Link to comment
EQD Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 i'd go as low as 6/10 looks and 10/10 personality. if personality declined then looks wouldnt do alot to sway my favor. Link to comment
grymoire Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Same as me. I'd even rather 4/10 looks if it were 10/10 personality. yea? serious? Link to comment
Tethys Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Agreed. I had to choose the lesser on looks vs personality... with no choice... Link to comment
grymoire Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 i'd go as low as 6/10 looks and 10/10 personality. if personality declined then looks wouldnt do alot to sway my favor. wow... really EqD? this comes as a surprise to me Link to comment
dragon lady Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 yea? serious? Yep. I don't want to date a disgusting pig, but I'd do a little below average for the sake of an awesome personality. That's far more important to me. Link to comment
EQD Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 wow... really EqD? this comes as a surprise to me Why? besides, i actually can't comment on this because the total package fell into my lap 5 months ago. Link to comment
laisla Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 yea i agree, 6/10 on looks is minimum for me. Link to comment
Romulus Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 i have no reference to what a 9 vs a 10 means. Although it doesnt matter what you look like, its just the inner confidence you have that attracks people, beautiful people just have a easier time finding that person inside them Link to comment
Seymore Posted April 9, 2009 Author Share Posted April 9, 2009 The point of making it so high isn't completely relevant - I just wanted people to imagine their ideal person personality wise and looks-wise, the ideal for each person being 10/10. So take the hottest guy/girl you can think of and the sweetest person with the best personality you can think of. I figured I'd make it a little tougher to decide by only having a difference by an increment of one, but alas, I guess that kinda flopped. People will go way further down on looks for a better personality. Good to see. Link to comment
LemonCheesecak Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Why be with someone if they look fantastic but have a no personality. That's what blow up dolls are for haha. But I suppose 9/10 isn't exactly no personality... Link to comment
laisla Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Why be with someone if they look fantastic but have a no personality. That's what blow up dolls are for haha. But I suppose 9/10 isn't exactly no personality... yea 9/10 on personality is still really good. it's definitely dateable. but i would rather have a 10/10, someone who is perfect for me, than someone who just looks perfect for me but are lacking in personality. Link to comment
melrich Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 i have no reference to what a 9 vs a 10 means. LOL...exactly. I had no idea that it was all so scientific. If you would go no lower than a 6/10 for looks....how do you know when someone gets there? Is there a chart or something? Or are you just guessing? Link to comment
EQD Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 i have no reference to what a 9 vs a 10 means. Although it doesnt matter what you look like, its just the inner confidence you have that attracks people, beautiful people just have a easier time finding that person inside them i would like to add the word *might* because you can be physically appealing and have 0 confidence. and that person inside of them isnt always 'wonderful' spiritually attractive or unattractive we all live on the same playing feild.. same potential imo. Link to comment
laisla Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 LOL...exactly. I had no idea that it was all so scientific. If you would go no lower than a 6/10 for looks....how do you know when someone gets there? Is there a chart or something? Or are you just guessing? ^ it's just a personal approximation. Link to comment
ghost69 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 not sure i care too much about sweetness. gotta be attractive though. inside and out. i won't pick either choice. it can never be clean cut like that. Link to comment
EQD Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 LOL...exactly. I had no idea that it was all so scientific. If you would go no lower than a 6/10 for looks....how do you know when someone gets there? Is there a chart or something? Or are you just guessing? 6 is like not terribly attractive but slightly more so than the average person. the average person evokes no real feelings or thought of 'ugly' or 'pretty' to look at. its a complex equation that runs like a background program on a computer... involves alot of "0's and 1's" and even a few 2's just because we have that extra human dimension. Physical attraction is yet another measure of human compatability Link to comment
paintedfish Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 I can honestly say looks matter very little to me, and the personality MAKES certain features attractive, in the end... However, if someone is below maybe an 8?/10 on HYGIENE... I don't really care how good their personality or looks are. Link to comment
melrich Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 ^ it's just a personal approximation. But how do you reference it? How do you think "he's a 5"....or do you even think that? I can't imagine ever thinking that...do people really have a number ranking in their head? I just react...attractive vs not attractive? Link to comment
dragon lady Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 But how do you reference it? How do you think "he's a 5"....or do you even think that? I can't imagine ever thinking that...do people really have a number ranking in their head? I just react...attractive vs not attractive? I would think: 1- ugliest you've ever seen 2-average 3-most physically attractive you've ever seen Link to comment
laisla Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 But how do you reference it? How do you think "he's a 5"....or do you even think that? I can't imagine ever thinking that...do people really have a number ranking in their head? I just react...attractive vs not attractive? that's what i meant by personal. like EQD said, a 5 is an "average" person that you can't say is unattractive nor attractive. to me someone who is a 6 is attractive in some ways but not someone who i'd be staring at when i first meet them. Link to comment
melrich Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 I would think: 1- ugliest you've ever seen 2-average 3-most physically attractive you've ever seen More like that for me. I think I maybe have 4 graduations. But this 9/10 vs 10/10 stuff seems a bit too micro for me. I think maybe with such rankings we are not seeing the forest for all the trees. Link to comment
paintedfish Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 I think people are putting too much emphasis on the ranking system when it was just used to show a general ratio of personality v. looks. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.