gracerules2008 Posted January 9, 2009 Author Share Posted January 9, 2009 I think it was going in that direction any way.. Hopefully. I'd rather get dumped for gaining too much weight than for not being intimate enough. Link to comment
Mythical_Suicide Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 Hopefully. I'd rather get dumped for gaining too much weight than for not being intimate enough. Link to comment
Lights Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 I think it was going in that direction any way.. LOL. Truth hurts. Link to comment
Stars_n_Guitars Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 actually, the recent pictures--she went ga-ga over!! Link to comment
knightingale Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 Do you plan to ever get married? Link to comment
gracerules2008 Posted January 9, 2009 Author Share Posted January 9, 2009 Do you plan to ever get married? When I'm 70 years old. Link to comment
cyberdog Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 A hysterectomy is the removal of the uterus, which is where the baby grows. So without it I doubt the woman will have a baby. But I would never ask a woman to go through such a severe operation to begin with. I've heard some rumors about a man having a baby but I don't know anything about it and for now just assume it is b/s. I've been researching a vasectomy myself after recent events. There are several ways to increase their effectiveness. Of course a skilled surgeon is important, but so is procedure. One common procedure is in addition to just cutting and sealing the tubes, it to remove a segment of the tube in order to reduce any chance of regrowth (recanalization). Also when putting the tubes back in place the two ends can be placed in different layers of the tissue, or some of the tissue can be removed and tied around the end of the upper tube. Removing a segment however will reduce the chances of a later reversal, but then you can always freeze some sperm. If both are done (segment removed and tissue tied around upper end) then a vasectomy would usually be very effective. In addition to that, using a condom (if used properly they are definitely better than 70%), maybe even the pill and withdraw all at once should give plenty of protection. That being the case I don't know anyone who would consider being celibate for life while only having phone-sex, and I'd leave any person who asked such from me in a heartbeat. Link to comment
cyberdog Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 When I'm 70 years old. I'm in agreement on that one, at least for now. Link to comment
littlestar Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 So as things stand right now I'm not willing to do real sex for the rest of my life for many reasons. The main one being that I don't want kids. I think phone sex works much better for me and that's where I'm drawing the line. I'm not going to cross that line and take the sex off-line. Would you continue a relationship with a SO who didn't want to go beyond phone sex? Why or why not? Would it be a deal-breaker? Everytime I have sex over the phone with my girlfriend it already feels like the real deal anyway. So there are ways to not have real sex and still feel like I'm having real sex. It's all about tricking your mind and that's what I've been doing. For me it would be a dealbreaker. I dont mind having phone sex but i like the real thing as well. I also dont want any kids but use protection. While this isnt 100% and it has failed me in the past i've opted for other options when i got pregnant. Link to comment
civilservant Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 You must have known you'd get this response when you posted this thread? Link to comment
waveseer Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 People draw the line wherever they want, I draw the line at drawing the line. Link to comment
babii doll Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 theres no way in h3ll i'd put up with that, sex is important to me, but i think you knew when posting this thread most ppl would have that reaction. Link to comment
cyberdog Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 When I first read it I though he meant: real sex (yes) | phone sex (no) Not: phone sex (yes) | real sex (no) It seems most people would go by the first order not the second, though they may not draw the line they would probably have real sex at an earlier stage than phone sex or consider phone sex out of the question period. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.