Adrian28 Posted October 3, 2007 Posted October 3, 2007 What boards? Dude you are rubbing off the wrong way with me, if you dont like my threads then you dont have to participate in them. I won't post the link to the other board, but this is the title of the thread. Is it more cost-effective to game, or just use an escort. Same nick as yours. Virgin. From Canada. Can there be two virgin, Canadian Luke Skywalkers posting about escorts? Possible, but highly unlikely.
Miss Firecracker Posted October 3, 2007 Posted October 3, 2007 I'm having a hard time understanding what you want to gain by posting this thread. You want us to condemn the woman who posed? I watch the news every single day, and this is pretty small stuff compared to many things I hear. So I guess you could say I'm not all that surprised or concerned. I don't look at any porn, so I don't care. If you stop looking, you won't have a problem. If it's legal, there isn't a thing you can do.
Luke Skywalker Posted October 3, 2007 Author Posted October 3, 2007 I won't post the link to the other board, but this is the title of the thread. Is it more cost-effective to game, or just use an escort. Same nick as yours. Virgin. From Canada. Can there be two virgin, Canadian Luke Skywalkers posting about escorts? Possible, but highly unlikely. So, how is that being obsessed with escorts? That's only one other board, you said I"ve posted stuff on many boards on the internet - that means you've over-exaggerated stuff. If you've noticed, that post was made today. Which means, I'm just on a particular roll today on the subject. I've been out of porn since April 13, 2007, and just these past couple of days I just looked at some stuff on an escort site - since all of these things were repressed in a period of over several months due to some internal legal stuff, it's now being purged out now. Thus, writing two threads in the space of one day, after several months have passed by with no such discussion I think is an overstatement of 'obsession'. Again, you dont know me and cant appreciate the complex imaginary legal system, date-phases, and the intricate system of time-zones - point is you dont know me and you are rubbing off the wrong way, and I dont have the time to explain my complex imaginary legal system - all I know is i"m on my first strike on this time-sector and discussions about escorts or anything pertaining to 'sex' is now legalized since september 28th by imaginary regulations. If you have a problem, then make up an imaginary case in my imaginary system, and my imaginary system will deal with it. Now you'd probably think I'm crazier the more I talk, goes to the fact that you dont know me and have no access to my world and probalby nobody does exept for me. I'm different from everyone else and thereforeeee think differnetly, and frankly, I dont care.
Luke Skywalker Posted October 3, 2007 Author Posted October 3, 2007 I'm having a hard time understanding what you want to gain by posting this thread. You want us to condemn the woman who posed? I watch the news every single day, and this is pretty small stuff compared to many things I hear. So I guess you could say I'm not all that surprised or concerned. I don't look at any porn, so I don't care. If you stop looking, you won't have a problem. If it's legal, there isn't a thing you can do. Good point. No, I just wanted to see what people on here thought about this, if they also thought it was disgusting. You are right, I ain't looking at any stuff, I'm over with this.
Miss Firecracker Posted October 3, 2007 Posted October 3, 2007 Good because it's obviously causing you a lot of grief.
Luke Skywalker Posted October 3, 2007 Author Posted October 3, 2007 Good because it's obviously causing you a lot of grief. Yes, it obviously is.
shes2smart Posted October 3, 2007 Posted October 3, 2007 If you feel you've got some sort of addiction to this stuff and are looking to deal with that, you might find this site helpful: link removed Among other things, they have a support forum that's divided into two sections...one for Porn Addicts (PA's) and the other for their Significant Others (SO's).
Luke Skywalker Posted October 3, 2007 Author Posted October 3, 2007 If you feel you've got some sort of addiction to this stuff and are looking to deal with that, you might find this site helpful: link removed Among other things, they have a support forum that's divided into two sections...one for Porn Addicts (PA's) and the other for their Significant Others (SO's). I'm banned from that site. Has not been helpful at the last.
Luke Skywalker Posted October 3, 2007 Author Posted October 3, 2007 I don't understand why people are attacking you so much. Maybe i'm missing something because I haven't read your other threads and they know more about you than I do. But come on people, why is it so outrageous that he finds it disgusting? Actually, only Adrian28 seems to have been attacking me, other posters seem confused as to the intent of this thread or agree with my views. I didn't write any other questionable thread, other than a philosophical one of which is worst, for guys to lie to women and play them in order to get sex or to use a hooker, and was discussing which was worst morally. Anyway I don't care about people's fetishes, that's their business. I just don't believe you should exploit your baby like that, especially publicly. And I think (think..) that's what Luke was mainly disgusted at. Of course, what else would I have been disgusted at? Imagine if that was your mother - before I'm even born I'm being used? Well, I guess that's not much worst than a welfare or foster mom that takes government money and neglects the children while using the money herself. Look at the risks she is taking too. Suppose she gets a john that gets off on really hurting her and giving her a mis-carriage or worst? That's why I think the child's life is in danger because you dont know what wackos (with money) are out there and these people are taking a bad risk.
Adrian28 Posted October 3, 2007 Posted October 3, 2007 I just don't believe you should exploit your baby like that, especially publicly. And I think (think..) that's what Luke was mainly disgusted at. garam masala, if that is the argument, then you are going down the slippery slope of determining the mother's rights and what she can with her own body. You say exploit your "baby", again does this unborn baby have any rights as a foetus? When does the foetus actually have life? Your arguments are at the heart of the abortion debate. Do you believe a woman should have a right to abortion? Or does the mother have rights? I don't expect an answer. It is a rhetorical question and can lead to a bitter, political debate. Luke is bringing his politics onto the board. And I don't think this is the place for it.
CaptainPlanet Posted October 3, 2007 Posted October 3, 2007 Hi prostitution has existed since ever so have all types of fetishes its not going to change just because you dislike it what you find disgusting someone else might find alluring we are all individual and as such entitled to our own unique sexual identity so long as no laws are broken just don't look at the websites k thnx
angelmaria Posted October 3, 2007 Posted October 3, 2007 Well, i don't look at any porn or erotic images when i touch myself...my imagination is enough for me. But like others have said...what some people find attractive and sensual, others find vile and disgusting. A lot of men like the look of a pregnant woman...and on the other spectrum, a lot of men like the look of a woman with semen drippinig all over her face! (same goes for women by the way) To each their own...all you can really say is that you think it is gross to you...so dont' look. Doesn't mean they should be banned from posting these kinds of ads. I don't find men seeking men ads alluring, but wouldn't ever think they shouldn't be posted...
Miss Firecracker Posted October 3, 2007 Posted October 3, 2007 I know a woman who used to cheat on her husband while she was expecting her babies. I think it turned her on to do this. And she would brag about it. I thought it was strange, but whatever. I'm sure her children do not remember this. The sad part is that she continued to cheat after they were both born, and she even told them about it after her divorce. If we worry too much about things like this, we won't ever make it.
Luke Skywalker Posted October 3, 2007 Author Posted October 3, 2007 garam masala, if that is the argument, then you are going down the slippery slope of determining the mother's rights and what she can with her own body. You say exploit your "baby", again does this unborn baby have any rights as a foetus? When does the foetus actually have life? Your arguments are at the heart of the abortion debate. Do you believe a woman should have a right to abortion? Or does the mother have rights? I don't expect an answer. It is a rhetorical question and can lead to a bitter, political debate. Luke is bringing his politics onto the board. And I don't think this is the place for it. I've posted, I think on my first post on this thread that she's 8 month's pregnant. That's not an abortion argument when it's that developed.
JadedStar Posted October 3, 2007 Posted October 3, 2007 I know a woman who used to cheat on her husband while she was expecting her babies. I think it turned her on to do this. And she would brag about it. I thought it was strange, but whatever. I'm sure her children do not remember this. The sad part is that she continued to cheat after they were both born, and she even told them about it after her divorce. If we worry too much about things like this, we won't ever make it. Sounds like my ex sister in law. And she LOVED being pregnant. Unfortunately she didn't love taking care of her kids once they arrived.
ProtestTheHero Posted October 4, 2007 Posted October 4, 2007 Yeah, I agree that it's nasty. I'm not going to attack you unless you make a thread about yourself, so I agree that pregnant women seeking out sex in ads from whoever did not make them pregnant is fairly disgusting. Unfortunately, humans are base animals. The majority of us are ruled by appetites instead of reason. We do whatever we can to feel good as quickly as possible to almost any expense. What a wonderful world. Lol.
JadedStar Posted October 4, 2007 Posted October 4, 2007 To be honest I find it far more disgusting that there are men out there wanking to pregnant lactacting women even more than the women taking the pic. reason being is a pic is a pic and she might desparately need the money. The men are actually getting aroused over it and masterbating. Not saying either/or is proper, but if i had to say which was more disturbing it is the men who seek out these pics. There would be no market if they weren't looking.
ProtestTheHero Posted October 4, 2007 Posted October 4, 2007 And there'd be no looking if they weren't taken. It's a chicken and egg argument. The problem is there will ALWAYS be a market for disgusting things. I'd rather assume that people are sick and not provide the material to feed the fire than rely on anything else.
JadedStar Posted October 4, 2007 Posted October 4, 2007 And there'd be no looking if they weren't taken. It's a chicken and egg argument. The problem is there will ALWAYS be a market for disgusting things. I'd rather assume that people are sick and not provide the material to feed the fire than rely on anything else. It's a personal opinion but i think the person chunking down the change bears a great deal of responsibility. Not saying the women are innocent tho. Don't get me on that soap box. LOL I can't stand strippers.
Luke Skywalker Posted October 4, 2007 Author Posted October 4, 2007 To be honest I find it far more disgusting that there are men out there wanking to pregnant lactacting women even more than the women taking the pic. reason being is a pic is a pic and she might desparately need the money. I can not speculate what other guys are doing on that site, but I would assume most people are on there looking for a paid hook-up with an escort since that's the intent of the whole set-up rather than a free porn show. As I have maintained, I have not looked at that photo to wack off as this was as gross to me as looking at a gay pic - the idea of getting aroused by something like that is sick. There was actual milk coming from the breasts - nausiating. Now given this, I still raise my point that I dont quite understand your reasoning between looking at a pic as being worst than exploiting an unborn 8 month old child for money and putting her at risk for potential wacko johns. I cant argue with that. Escorts have been murdered or hurt by johns before, and it's a bit of a dangerous occupation because sometimes they are dealing with criminal elements of society. To desperately want money to the point of doing is unfair to the unborn child. The men are actually getting aroused over it and masterbating. Not saying either/or is proper, but if i had to say which was more disturbing it is the men who seek out these pics. There would be no market if they weren't looking. There would be no market for it if no money exchanged hands. Looking doesn't support an escort industry. If everyone looked all the pics would come down because nobody would be making money. Again, I fail to see your logic.
JadedStar Posted October 4, 2007 Posted October 4, 2007 Now given this, I still raise my point that I dont quite understand your reasoning between looking at a pic as being worst than exploiting an unborn 8 month old child for money and putting her at risk for potential wacko johns. I cant argue with that. We can only hope she gives up the occupation after the child is born. Thing is, a lot of sick disturbing things goes on in this world. We'd go completely nuts if we allowed ourselves to get really upset over all of it.
melrich Posted October 4, 2007 Posted October 4, 2007 Looking doesn't support an escort industry. If everyone looked all the pics would come down because nobody would be making money. Again, I fail to see your logic. Actually it does. The more visits a site gets, the more click ons, the more valuable is the site and any potential ad revenue or sale value. Your mouse clicks are very valuable.
JadedStar Posted October 4, 2007 Posted October 4, 2007 Actually it does. The more visits a site gets, the more click ons, the more valuable is the site and any potential ad revenue or sale value. Your mouse clicks are very valuable. So true. That seems a bit of denial to think that looking at these pics is not contributing to it at all. Those clicks do count. Advertisers pay big bucks to advertsie their little banners on those sites, far more than they might pay for other sites. And the number of clicks can command a pretty high rate.
Luke Skywalker Posted October 4, 2007 Author Posted October 4, 2007 Actually it does. The more visits a site gets, the more click ons, the more valuable is the site and any potential ad revenue or sale value. Your mouse clicks are very valuable. No, escorts have to PAY to advertise on those sites. That money comes from johns who use their services. The site itself doesn't pay money to them to post pictures up. And you know what, they dont have any ads going on there other than links to other escort sites. What legitimate family company (which comprises the majority of business advertisement) is going to want to advertise in that board to get boycotted once the publicity goes out? Nobody wants to touch that with a ten foot pole. It's a laugh though, imagine a Century 21 office advertising on that site - more damage than benefits - no legitimate advertisment dollars are going on those sites.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.