PaulvonMunich

Will we all be on earth, writing this here... if Adam & Eve did not find it worth doing IT?

Granted! It does do a man's ego good to know he's got a BIG one... and many, many females do LOVE having something huge stuffed into them. So SyberSlidder, you are lucky to be thus 'blessed'. But I do begin to wonder if my hero, dear old CASANOVA, would not want to turn round in his grave...

See what I mean...

Bravo Billy Jean! It's so good to see there are still lots of 'good women' nowadays. It may seem I am contradicting myself saying this, after having recently aired that I find it good not to be too conservative about talking about sex. Having said that, I hope many ladies can still appreciate what comes next... It is a fact and a supreme feeling for a MAN, as in my case, to realise, when-ever he did manage to be in bed with a 'conservative' woman, that he was a lucky guy, being able to 'exchange deep feelings', and bodily sensations too, with a 'rare' female. For she doesn't do 'THIS' with just any Tom, * * * * (what a pun!) and Harry. Right? But 'talking' is not the same as 'doing' sex. I do love doing a lot of 'TALK SEX', cybering with even hitherto unknown females. But it shouldn't harm anybody thereby involved. It's not the same as having actual coitus, is it? Now... ladies, please take note, many of my cyber sex partners have had the unexpected benefits of enjoying orgasms without having to, so to speak, feel they had to discard their dignity. Honestly, my 'sex-periences' have convinced me that having sex with an open-minded, brave-hearted, honest, but freely naughtily talkative female had turned many a dull 'bed-bout' into extra orgasmic sex-trafficking! For me, it's always a joy to realise before launching into sex that my lady was not going to say... take me... (or it!) if you want to... or something like that. Many have claimed, sex involves more than quick shufflings of a penis in and out of a vagina. It takes feelings too. Only too true! But isn't be also true that sex can be something to look forward to - yes, for me, at least! - as being yet another 'style' of achieving orgasm(s!) without a dull moment during the proceeding? Sex-talkative females can add 'spices' to life for a man, without having to engage in actual sex with him, for whom affection is still to be nourished. This brings me to say that I have enjoyed lots of CYBER SEX sessions too. I have had such extra enjoyment during the verbal erotic exchanges, knowing that I was giving my female eSex partners some orgasms which she would not have had with a man for whom she had not yet developed deep feelings. But I think I should start another thread on the theme of CYBER SEX.

this is most likely due to your hormones changing their consistancy, components, etc. as your body make-up gradually gets more sexually-matured, through consistent masturbation. You will no doubt notice further changes in colour, and even in odour, as and when you start having proper sex.

I like what you say about de-virgination. It is worth it... even from a man's point of view. For when there is affection (not necessarily love, mind!) a man-woman-bond is 'bridged' in the lover-pair's minds. And so what is needed (or desired?) next should be nothing less than a body-bridge, right? And for me, it means even more! On such a 'rare and precious occasion', I can't help feeling being honoured with the challenge of directing the delicate 'Yin & Yang balancing' performance through the love-sex-act onto a harmonious crescendo. By the way, has it dawned on anyone that Chinese males have a 'BIG' (actually should read 'SMALL'!) advantage when it comes to making love with a virgin-female? Know why too? PAUL alias 'bayrisCHinaman'

Great words of wisdom - something like what Confuzius might have said!? Many are well-educated enough not to want to crawl around copulating like animals. I, for instance, am married but have become a 'grass widower' for the past 5 years. My wife wants no more sex. But the farthest I would go - short of adultery - is let a masseuse 'spoil' me with Lomi Lomi Nui massages. A couple of them had, after a few sessions, and lots of honest chats, even gone onto performing what is similar to tantra massage. Different people of difference educational, family, etc. backgrounds have different attitude towards sex - and their expressions, both verbally and bodily - are dictated by the person's mood on different occasions. For one, I can be very blatantly sexual in my expressions when writing my sex-stories. But I can also be very tight-laced when I am with an old lady. Circumstances demand appropriate behaviour modes! Yet in INTERNET forums - like here, for instance - one can, and should when in the appropriate section - be very open, even direct. But please, one just should be honest and not at all vulgar. There is another good reason why many don't want to voice themselves too openly. There tend to be simply too many sex-frustrated single males who go around attacking others who dare be explicit whilst conducting sexual discussions. I have personally been attacked by many 'JEALOUS' buggers! Apologies for using bad word - but that's the exact fitting description for such types... too many of them... pity. That's why so many rape, molest criminal cases happening around the world nowadays, I suppose. If only these 'males' can open their mind up to accept others' opinion. Personally, wiriting sex-stories, conducting cyber sex (mind you, for those who are brave enough, both males & females!) can contribute to easing lots of sexual frustrations. This is 'letting off steam' in the positive fashion. Those who attack others expressing themselves 'bravely' are cowardly and seeking to 'leak off their frusts' via negative channels. I would advocate more HONEST, OPPEN-MINDED, NON-VULGAR discussions, any time. PAUL

...I mean, INTELLIGENT it appears to me. A quick answer to your claim from me is Intelligent females pose the most interesting CHALLENGE to me! Mind you, I - being a 'GEMINI' and have a lot of CHINAMAN in me - I tend to lean towards erotic thing, etc. You want me to tackle you? PAUL