Facebook share
LinkedIn share
Google plus share
Twitter plus share
Give Advice
Ask For Advice
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: 500 Days of Summer: a textbook commitment-phobe?

  1. #1
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Age
    41
    Posts
    626
    Gender
    Male

    500 Days of Summer: a textbook commitment-phobe?

    Watched 500 Days of Summer the other night.

    The female character Summer
    - gives wildly conflicting signals from day one. "Come here/ stay away": telling the guy they are great as friends, then one day unprompted, coming over and kissing him. Doing "couple" things like going to Ikea, but always telling him that she doesn't want a relationship
    - does not take the guy's feelings seriously if it will be inconvenient for her. After months of the f***-buddy arrangement, when he says he needs to know what they are to each other, she acts surprised.
    - has had a string of superficial involvements with previous partners, all of which ended with no reason given. She also appears to have little regret or feeling for any of the break-ups, they were "just life", she says. As an above-average attractive woman, she doesn't much care where the next guy will come from, but she knows he will come along.
    - at the end of the film, she is married (to some other guy). She says, she just woke up one day and felt sure that now was the time, and this was the guy. The film's hero asks her how she could go back on everything she had said before ("I don't want relationships / Relationships are messy"). She just says, She felt sure, "in a way that she never did with him". <near enough break's the hero's heart here>

    Firstly, if it was a man acting like this woman did, the world and his cousin would be saying what a jerk he was and how he uses women to get what he wants. Can it actually be that there are women out there who identify with Summer, and see her behaviour as the way to be in real life? Or even, those who put a politico-feminist spin on it and see it as a woman's right to do what she likes as long as she is alright herself?

    Secondly, how can such women be so toxic? Lead someone on, then use the get-out clause "I was up front, I said I didn't want a relationship" while continuing to use the hapless idiot's body knowing that his feelings are getting deeper? Then breaking up, and when she feels like it, pole-vaulting into a marriage with another man using the smokescreen of "I've found love; s*** happens".

    Never mind that I think the film's hero was a total idiot for letting himself be involved with a witch like her. They call it a romantic comedy; I found nothing romantic or comedic in this film, it just incensed me.

  2. #2
    Platinum Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,371
    In the hypothetical as you put it, I see nothing wrong with what the woman was doing as she was totally upfront about it. If the guy sticks around hoping and waiting for her to change then he's the sucker. Works same way for both sexes. Be honest. Not only with your partner, but with yourself as well.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,561
    Gender
    Female
    She's the textbook "inconsiderate" and he's the textbook "wishful thinker".

  4. #4
    Gold Member I_Speak_Jive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    700
    Gender
    Male
    I haven't seen this film, but your description just confirms what I have been thinking all along --that there is no such thing as "commitment-phobia". It's just another rather meaningless buzzword that gets thrown around to act as a band-aid for dumped people, while actually doing more damage than good by making them falsely pathologise their ex instead of viewing them as real and complex humans.

    I don't understand what people mean by "commitment-phobia". I understand "not wanting to make a commitment to you". But this doesn't mean there is anything wrong or broken or off with the other person --it just means that they do not want to make a commitment to you.

    Like the girl in that film, who apparently had no problems getting married to the right guy. Nothing "phobic" about that.

  5.  

  6. #5

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    BLAM!
    Age
    40
    Posts
    6,080
    Gender
    Male
    So... wait a minute. She was upfront and honest with him. She told him exactly where she was at all times emotionally and physically, and he stuck around... why? Because he was hoping she'd change her mind? That she'd grow to love him in time?

    When women at ENA do this, we tell them "It's time to leave." -- Well, he didn't leave. He wanted to assume responsibility and the unspoken (or spoken) truth is "I can handle this too."

    It's not her fault that he couldn't handle it. It's also not her fault that she didn't have feelings for him "that way" -- She's not a monster, she's not a b***h. She's a human being and just because he's a good guy, and he WANTS/NEEDS her love, that doesn't mean she's supposed to produce it on command like cupcakes from an easy bake oven.

    I don't think this has much to do with the film, OP. I think you've been in this guy's shoes before, or close to it, and rather than see it logically or in the big picture, you're just reinforcing and justifying your hurt and anger that some lady "done you wrong."

    It's time to move on. It's time to grow up and recognize that you (and he) are responsible for your choices. If no one's lying to you, who else is there to blame but yourself?

  7. #6

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,561
    Gender
    Female
    I certainly agree that when men do this, they are considered assblanks. Without a doubt. There is a double standard there.

  8. #7
    Platinum Member Siriana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    39
    Posts
    3,945
    That was a good movie, but it left me not feeling so well afterwards.
    I didn't think she was a bad person. She just didn't know how it feels being with the right person. Let's say that he was wiser in knowing how it feels loving someone, but incredibly naive and kinda unfair expecting her to change her mind about their relationship. Yeah, he was a wishful thinker. Did she annoy me? Oh, yes she did.

  9. #8
    Silver Member mr.mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    43
    Posts
    609
    Gender
    Male
    As a male who loves this movie, and relates to it, I am somewhat biased towards it, but I understand your angst.

    My girlfriend and I saw the movie on opening weekend together and when it was over we sat there for a moment and she said to me "I'm a lot like Summer, huh?" And she is. Read my threads. She is this character. Fun and exciting when she wants to be and just as ridiculous and unagreeable when she wants to be. Its who she is.

    I used to fault her for being this way, but mostly now I see that she is insecure and afraid of letting down her walls. She is Summer. And I am Tom, to an extent. I want to believe in love and the things that she says. I want to believe that I can be the one to help her change. Not make her change, mind you, but help her. I see myself being the person that helps her make the changes in her life and then watching her getting it right with someone else. Maybe that's my role in her life. Like it was Tom's.

    I guess the way I look at this film is that it is fun and it is real. is it depressing at times? of course, but it has a lot of fun stuff in it and if I can live it (sort of) and still find the fun in it, hopefully you can too. And besides, I hate to think that you think Tom is an idiot because then I wonder what that makes me.

  10. #9

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    West Bay
    Posts
    5,708
    She is this character. Fun and exciting when she wants to be and just as ridiculous and unagreeable when she wants to be. Its who she is.
    Are people any other way? People's feelings and emotions change. That's the very nature of feelings. They aren't static. If they were, you'd be a robot. Everyone is "sometimes fun and exciting" and "sometimes disagreeable". No one is exempt.

    There is nothing wrong with her character except that some men will hate her because they can't have her and she won't fall in love with them. And as for dating and courtship, is that really how it works in some people's brains? You just meet someone and then, blamo, you have to make up your mind immediately on that person for the rest of your life? Before even going through all the tribulations and trials that are necessary to really get to know someone? It's not like you're buying cattle. Courting and dating are a necessary right of passage. That's how you learn to really know someone romantically, not by just sleeping with them and going out to dinner a few times. You have to make it all the way through a 3 month honeymoon period before you can ever really begin to feel even relatively "sure".

    For all those that have said, "I just knew and I was just sure right away"... nonsense. You knew no such thing. You simply projected your own fantasies and ideals on the other person, really, really wanted it to work (so you tried a lot harder and were more understanding), and then you got lucky that the other person kept reciprocating your feelings enough so that you got past the honeymoon, and you were completely invested. That's the start of a "real, lasting partnership."

    The "we just always knew" business and utter nonsense, and just something fantastical we tell ourselves because it's a fun story to tell at dinner parties, and you can feel like you're life is somehow "magic". \

    The character in the story was "kicking the tires" on a long term relationship with the man. She really liked the man, and thought maybe her feelings would change into full blown "let's make this last", but they never did. That's her absolute right. It's just foolishness to think otherwise.

  11. #10
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Age
    41
    Posts
    626
    Gender
    Male
    Originally Posted by IphigeniaSaysHi
    I certainly agree that when men do this, they are considered assblanks. Without a doubt. There is a double standard there.
    Yes, I got that impression too.

    Originally Posted by ersatz81
    I don't understand what people mean by "commitment-phobia". I understand "not wanting to make a commitment to you". But this doesn't mean there is anything wrong or broken or off with the other person --it just means that they do not want to make a commitment to you.

    Like the girl in that film, who apparently had no problems getting married to the right guy. Nothing "phobic" about that.
    Hey ersatz,

    You see, commitment-phobia is another these oft-discussed topics, and I know full well a lot of people don't believe in its existence. Two things:
    - there have been eNAers, people who've looked in deep and realised that they are commitment phobes, and written on here to say so. After a long time of telling themselves that they "were just not meeting the right person". I don't think they'd be that wrong about themselves.
    - commitment-phobes can and do get married. Does not make them less of a commitment-phobe. It just means their marriages break up after some time, or never even become healthy marriages in the first place. Ah, we make the mistake of thinking the ring solves it all and puts to bed all emotional issues? It doesn't. Why should it, after all?

    Originally Posted by hexaemeron
    So... wait a minute. She was upfront and honest with him. She told him exactly where she was at all times emotionally and physically, and he stuck around... why? Because he was hoping she'd change her mind? That she'd grow to love him in time?
    ........
    I don't think this has much to do with the film, OP. I think you've been in this guy's shoes before, or close to it, and rather than see it logically or in the big picture, you're just reinforcing and justifying your hurt and anger that some lady "done you wrong."

    It's time to move on. It's time to grow up and recognize that you (and he) are responsible for your choices. If no one's lying to you, who else is there to blame but yourself?
    Ah, you need to read my final line in the original post.
    "Never mind that I think the film's hero was a total idiot for letting himself be involved with a witch like her".

    By all means, the guy carries responsibility. I watched in disbelief as despite every sign to the contrary, he sat there like an idiot hoping that somehow his love would change her feelings.

    But respectfully, I completely disagree that doing an unethical thing (playing with someone's emotions) yet being up-front and telling the person that you are doing it, somehow absolves the person of any wrong-doing.

    P*** on my leg, but as long as you tell me you are about to p*** on my leg while you're undoing your zipper - it's OK. So pissing on someone's leg becomes an OK thing to do.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Give Advice
Ask For Advice

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •