teknoise

Ya I'll agree with you there, if you smoked 20 joints a day you'd be worse off than the guy that smoked 20 cigarettes a day. Actually, ifg you smoked 20 joints a day you'd probably be retarded! But I'm talking about average pot user vs. average nicotine user. hahaha. what? Glass in weed? That's definitely lulzworthy! Who told you that? No... they don't put glass in weed. That sort of thing is bad for business!

You still aren't getting it though... We have all these deaths in smokers because its more dangerous, not because there are more of them. That's what I am trying to say. There have been ZERO deaths attributed directly to smoking weed. No overdoses, no cancer patients from long term use. So lets say that in proportion there are only 20 weed smokers to every 100 smokers. Lets say 20 of those smokers die from cigarettes. Since zero weed smokers die from smoking weed, even if the weed smokers upped their population from 20 to 100, there'd still be.... ZERO deaths! Even if there were 1000 weed smokers for every 100 cigarette smokers, there'd still be zero deaths! Maybe if there 100,000 weed smokers to every 100 smokers we would have a death or two, who knows.. can't say for sure since there's never been one. If you take 100 lifelong weed smokers and 100 lifelong cigarette smokers there are more death in the cigarette smokers group. We don't hear of people dying from weed because there aren't enough people smoking it (trust me, there are a LOT of pot smokers out there), we don't hear of people dying from weed because people just don't die from smoking it. Weed's boring, I don't smoke it more than once or twice a month now. But when I was smoking weed everyday I was in much better condition than when I smoking a pack-a-day.

Thus the emoticon! I said that because its about a odd as asserting that the length of time that something spends in your body has something to do with how bad it is for you. Thats not the point you were trying to make. Had you said that pot and cigarettes are harder to overdose on than booze, you'd be right. But in context you said: marijuana smoke is worse than cigarette smoke. that has been proven. smoke is bad for your lungs anyway. and nobody had died from overdose on cigs either. so your point doesn't justify anything on cigs vs. weed. Overdosing has absolutely nothing to do with it. Point for point, cigarettes are directly responsible for killing more people per user than marijuana. Its irrelevant how they died, as long as its a direct result. Smoking a pack a day and dying of lung cancer is as JUST AS MUCH a result of smoking as overdosing on nicotine.

Read any research paper on the subject. Alcohol is way worse. link removed There are a number of political reason why marijuana is illegal, none of which I will go into here as its not relevant but there are many resources on the subject if you are interested. That doesn't count though. Impairment is a direct result of marijuana, but the possible affects of impairment are completely indirect results of marijuana use and do not count as possible side affects to the body. Operating an iPod can cause you to become paraylyzed, brain dead, amputated/decapitated, burnt & so on if you operate an iPod while driving. But you wouldn't say that a side affect of using an iPod is possible brain damage and decapitation! lol. 1. Where does it say that marijuana kills brain cells or is in other words, neurotoxic which is essentially what the question is asking. There is no research out there that indicates marijuana is neurotoxic. 2. There is no research that inidcates THC (the active ingredient in marijuana) to be a physically addictive substance 3. Right. You cannot overdose..... and as a result... 4. No! You cannot overdose and thereforeeee cannot directly die from marijuana use. 5. Who said pot causes depression? link removed link removed. You've got your drugs mixed up there. link removed Alcohol kills more brain cells and does more damage to you then marijuana. In fact, link removed Its sad to see people brainwashed by propaganda that went out of style in the 40s! Both drugs can be done in moderation and you'll be totally fine! And I'll throw this out there too, that use of other non-addictive drugs such as mdma, ketamine, lsd, and psylocybin can also be used in moderation with little to no neurotoxicity or toxicity to the body if done properly and responsibly. Of course I am definitely NOT condoning doing these drugs (as fun as they are!), but just pointing out that the human body is a very resilient vessel and when drugs are used responsibly you can do little to no permanent damage and lead a completely normal and reasonably healthy life. Not really... What does it say? Know how long bubble gum stays in your system? Lol... actually thousands die a year from smoking!

I went back to my ex-wife after she cheated. I got suspicions that she was cheating again so I cheated on her a bunch of times with a couple randoms girls to preemptively be on the same page as her had she cheated. I realized what dumb logic that was, and how I had no trust for her and a relationship without trust is pointless so I took off. Turns out she was indeed cheating afterall. I don't go back to cheaters anymore. Seems like a silly concept when there are so many beautiful single women out there. Why the hell stick with one who disrespects you? Seems sadistic.

I think waiting until marriage is akin to buying a car without test driving it first. Knowing ever aspect of your partner before marriage helps prevent your 1 in 2 chance of divorce. Ya think? 50% divorce rate says otherwise.

I'd say about 5-10 times per week. Seems about average for a couple in the 1st sis month's of their relationship.