|
| Home | Forum | Search |
| eNotAlone > Career & Money |
The Art of the Start: The Time-tested, Battle-hardened Guide For Anyone Starting Anything (Page 3 of 6) The third step is not to fire up Word to write a business plan, launch PowerPoint to craft a pitch, or boot Excel to build a financial projection. Wrong, wrong, wrong! My goal in giving you this advice is not to reduce the sales of Microsoft Office - remember, I'm off the anti-Microsoft podium. There's a time for using all three applications, but it's not now. What you should do is (a) rein in your anal tendency to craft a document and (b) implement. This means building a prototype, writing software, launching your Web site, or offering your services. The hardest thing about getting started is getting started. (This is as true for a writer as it is for an entrepreneur.) Remember: No one ever achieved success by planning for gold. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
You should always be selling - not strategizing about selling. Don't test, test, test - that's a game for big companies. Don't worry about being embarrassed. Don't wait to develop the perfect product or service. Good enough is good enough. There will be plenty of time for refinement later. It's not how great you start - it's how great you end up. The enemy of activation is cogitation, and at this stage, cogitating the "strategic" issues of research and development is a problem. Questions like, How far can we leap ahead? What if everyone doesn't like what we do? and Should we design for a target customer or make what we would want to use? are beside the point when you're getting a new venture off the ground. Instead, observe these key principles of getting going:
Car design is a good example of the love-versus-hate reaction; consider the bifurcation of people's reactions to cars such as the Mini Cooper, Infiniti Fx45, and Toyota Scion xB. People are either devoted fans or relentless critics, and that's good. DESIGN DIFFERENT. Depending on what management fad is hot, you might be tempted to believe that there is only one ideal way to design products and services. This isn't true. There is no single best way. Here are four different and valid approaches - and I am sure there are more. "I WANT ONE." This is the best kind of market research - the customer and the designer are the same person. Therefore, the customer's voice can reach the designer's mind uncorrupted by corporate politics, reliance on the status quo, and market researchers. Example: Ferdinand Porsche said, "In the beginning I looked around and, not finding the automobile of my dreams, decided to build it myself."* "MY EMPLOYER COULDN'T (OR WOULDN'T) DO IT." Not as romantic as "I want one," but this is a credible path. You already understand the customer base, competition, supply sources, and industry contacts because of your background. You still need to build the product or service and get customers, but many questions are already answered. For example, alumni of Unit 8200 of the Israeli Defense Forces went on to create companies such as Checkpoint after developing security software for the military. "WHAT THE HELL - IT'S POSSIBLE!" This theory isn't popular when times are tough, and microscopes are flourishing. At these times, the world has turned conservative and demands that every market be "proven." Markets for curve-jumping, paradigm-shifting leaps are seldom proven in advance. For example, when Motorola invented cellular telephones, no one leaped to buy them. At that time, portable phone was an oxymoron because phones were always attached to places. There was no market for phones that customers could move. "THERE MUST BE A BETTER WAY." The organization born of this philosophy is based on the idealistic notion that you can make the world a better place by doing something new. In many cases, the founders had backgrounds with no logical connection to the business. They simply got an idea and decided to do it. Example: eBay. Pierre Omidyar, the founder, wanted to implement a system for a "perfect market" for the sale of goods. (The story of his girlfriend wanting to sell Pez dispensers was an after-the-fact PR tale.) USE PROTOTYPES AS MARKET RESEARCH. In the early days of an organization, there is high uncertainty about exactly what you should create and exactly what customers want. In these times, traditional market research is useless - there is no survey or focus group that can predict customer acceptance for a product or service that you may barely be able to describe. Would you buy a new computer with no software, no hard disk, and no color that simulates the real world - including a trash can?* The wisest course of action is to take your best shot with a prototype, immediately get it to market, and iterate quickly. If you wait for ideal circumstances in which you have all the information you need (which is impossible), the market will pass you by. The expected outcome of the "get going" principle is a first release of a product or service. Remember: it won't be perfect. But don't revise your product to get prospective customers to love it. Instead, revise it because customers already love it. Let me put it in religious terms: Some people believe that if they change, God will love them. Others believe that since God loves them, they should change. The latter theory is the prototype to keep in mind for how to get going and keep going for startups.
Copyright © 2004 Guy Kawasaki. All rights reserved. This excerpt, or any parts thereof, may not be reproduced without permission. About the Author Guy Kawasaki, who helped make Macintosh a household name, now runs Garage Technology Ventures, a venture-capital firm. He has held his workshop, "Boot Camp for Start-ups," around the world. Kawasaki is the author of seven previous books, including Rules for Revolutionaries. More by Guy Kawasaki |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2008 eNotAlone.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||