Home | Forum | Search
Own Your Own Corporation
Buy
Your Entity Menu : Part 10
Own Your Own Corporation : Why the Rich Own Their Own Companies and Everyone Else Works for Them
by Garrett Sutton, Esq.

(Page 10 of 11)

Compounding Jim's concerns was that he had five valuable real estate holdings that he wanted to go to the boys. His wife had passed on several years before and he needed to make some estate planning decisions. But given the boys' energy level and lack of direction he did not want them controlling or managing the real estate.

Jim knew that if he left the assets in his own name, when he died the IRS would take 55 percent of his estate, which was valued at over $2 million. And while estate taxes were to be gradually eliminated, Jim knew that Congress could always reinstate them. Jim had worked too hard, and had paid income taxes once already before buying the properties, to let the IRS's estate taxes take away half his assets. But again, he could not let his boys have any sort of control over the assets. While the government could squander 55 percent of his assets, he knew that his boys could easily top that with a 100 percent effort.

Jim asked his friends to refer him to a good attorney who could put together a plan to assist him. The attorney he met with suggested that Jim place the five real estate holdings into five separate limited partnerships.

It was explained to Jim that the beauty of a limited partnership was that all management control was in the hands of the general partner. The limiteds were not allowed to get involved in the business. Their activity was "limited" to being passive owners.

It was explained that the general partner can own as little as 1 percent of the limited partnership, with the limited partners owning the other 99 percent of it, and yet the general partner can have 100 percent control in how the entity was managed. The limited partners, even though they own 99 percent, cannot be involved. This was a major and unique difference between the limited partnership and the limited liability company or a corporation. If the boys owned 99 percent of an LLC or a corporation they could vote out their dad, sell the assets, and have a party for the ages. Not so with a limited partnership.

The limited partnership was perfect for Jim. He could not imagine his boys performing any sort of responsible management. At least not now. And at the same time he wanted to get the assets out of his name so he would not pay a huge estate tax. The limited partnership was the best entity for this. The IRS allowed discounts when you used a limited partnership for gifting. So instead of gifting $10,000 tax free to each boy he could gift $12,500 or more to each boy. Over a period of years, his limited partnership interest in each of the limited partnerships would be reduced and the boys' interest would be increased. When Jim passed on, his estate tax would be based only on the amount of interest he had left in each limited partnership. If he lived long enough he could gift away his entire interest in all five limited partnerships.

Except for his general partnership interest. By retaining his 1 percent general partnership interest, Jim could control the entities until the day he died. While he was hopeful his boys would straighten out, the limited partnership format allowed him total control in the event that did not happen. Jim also liked the attorney's advice that each of the five properties be put into five separate limited partnerships. It was explained to him that the strategy today is to segregate assets. If someone gets injured at one property and sues, it is better to only have one property exposed. If all five properties were in the same limited partnership, the person suing could go after all five properties to satisfy his claim. By segregating assets into separate entities the person suing can only go after the one property where they were injured.

An added benefit to segregating assets in Jim's case was the boys were interested in different activities. One of the properties housed a batting cage business and another a laundromat. He could see Bob being interested in the batting cage business and Aaron meeting girls while owning the laundromat. (Jim owned nothing that would currently appeal to Chris.) As the boys got older he could gift more of one limited partnership to one boy and more of another to another.

Jim liked the control and protections afforded by the limited partnership entity and proceeded to immediately form five of them. To organize a limited partnership you must file a certificate of limited partnership, otherwise known as an LP-1, with your state secretary of state's office. This document contains certain information about the general partner and, depending on the state, limited partners and is akin to the filing of articles of incorporation for a corporation or articles of organization for a LLC. As with the LLC, the LP offers certain unique advantages not found in other entities. These features include:

Limited Liability

Limited partners are not responsible for the partnership's debts beyond the amount of their capital contribution or contribution obligation. So, as discussed, unless they become actively involved, the limited partners are protected. As a general rule, general partners are personally liable for all partnership debts. But as was mentioned above, there is a way to protect the general partner of a limited partnership. To reduce liability exposure, corporations or LLCs are formed to serve as general partners of the limited partnership. In this way, the liability of the general partner is encapsulated in a limited liability entity. Assume a creditor sues a limited partnership over a business debt and seeks to hold the general partner liable. If the general partner is a corporation or LLC, that is where the liability ends. No one's personal assets are at risk.

As such, many, if not most, limited partnerships are organized using corporations or LLCs as general partners. In this way, both the limited and general partners achieve limited liability protection.

Retained Management

Because by definition limited partners may not participate in management, the general partner maintains complete control. In many cases, the general partner will hold only 1 percent or 2 percent of the partnership interest but will be able to assert 100 percent control over the partnership. This feature is valuable in estate planning situations where a parent is gifting or has gifted limited partnership interests to his children. Until such family members are old enough or trusted enough to act responsibly, the senior family members may continue to manage the LP even though only a very small general partnership interest is retained.

« Previous     Next »

Copyright © 2001 by Garrett Sutton, Esq.

About the Author

Garrett Sutton, Esq. has over twenty five years experience assisting and advising entrepreneurs, families and business in selecting the appropriate corporate structures to limit their liability, protect their assets, build their credit and advance their personal and financial goals through real estate investments and other means of wealth creation. Sutton is the owner of Sutton Law Center, Sutton Law which has offices in Reno, Nevada, Jackson Hole, Wyoming and Sacramento California.

More by Garrett Sutton, Esq.
  In this book
» Part 1
» Part 2
» Part 3
» Part 4
» Part 5
» Part 6
» Part 7
» Part 8
» Part 9
» Part 10
Related Topics
Success
Money and Relationships
Personal Finance
Articles & Books
The Idea of Fierce - Fierce Conversations: Achieving Success at Work & in Life, One Conversation at a Time
If you have opened this book, it may be because the conversations you've been having with your coworkers or with your family members often fail to produce the results you want. Over ten thousand hours of one-to-one conversations with industry leaders
Prologue - You'll Never Nanny in This Town Again : The True Adventures of a Hollywood Nanny
Hilarious and addictive, this chronicle of a small-town girl's stint as a celebrity nanny reveals what really happens in the diaper trenches of Hollywood. When Oregon native Suzanne Hansen becomes a live-in nanny to the children of Hollywood über
Money and Its Opposite - The Working Poor: Invisible in America
“Nobody who works hard should be poor in America,” writes Pulitzer Prize winner David Shipler. Clear-headed, rigorous, and compassionate, he journeys deeply into the lives of individual store clerks and factory workers, farm laborers and sweat

© 2008 eNotAlone.com