|
| Home | Forum | Search |
| eNotAlone > Health > Disorders and Diseases > Infectious Diseases |
|
Malaria : Diagnosis
(Page 2 of 14) Malaria must be recognized promptly in order to treat the patient in time and to prevent further spread of infection in the community. Malaria should be considered a potential medical emergency and should be treated accordingly. Delay in diagnosis and treatment is a leading cause of death in malaria patients in the United States. Malaria can be suspected based on the patient's symptoms and the physical findings at examination. However, for a definitive diagnosis to be made, laboratory tests must demonstrate the malaria parasites or their components. Diagnosis of malaria can be difficult: Where malaria is not endemic any more (such as the United States), health care providers are not familiar with the disease. Clinicians seeing a malaria patient may forget to consider malaria among the potential diagnoses and not order the needed diagnostic tests. Laboratorians may lack experience with malaria and fail to detect parasites when examining blood smears under the microscope. | |||||||
In some areas, malaria transmission is so intense that a large proportion of the population is infected but not made ill by the parasites. Such carriers have developed just enough immunity to protect them from malarial illness but not from malarial infection. In that situation, finding malaria parasites in an ill person does not necessarily mean that the illness is caused by the parasites. In many malaria-endemic countries, lack of resources is a major barrier to reliable and timely diagnosis. Health personnel are undertrained, underequipped and underpaid. They often face excessive patient loads, and must divide their attention between malaria and other equally severe infectious diseases such as pneumonia, diarrhea, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS. Clinical Diagnosis Clinical diagnosis is based on the patient's symptoms and on physical findings at examination. The first symptoms of malaria (most often fever, chills, sweats, headaches, muscle pains, nausea and vomiting) are often not specific and are also found in other diseases (such as the "flu" and common viral infections). Likewise, the physical findings are often not specific (elevated temperature, perspiration, tiredness). In severe malaria (caused by Plasmodium falciparum), clinical findings (confusion, coma, neurologic focal signs, severe anemia, respiratory difficulties) are more striking and may increase the suspicion index for malaria. Thus, in most cases the early clinical findings in malaria are not typical and need to be confirmed by a laboratory test. "Presumptive Treatment" In highly endemic areas (particularly in Africa), the great prevalence of asymptomatic infections and lack of resources (such as microscopes and trained microscopists) have led peripheral health facilities to use "presumptive treatment". Patients who suffer from a fever that does not have any obvious cause are presumed to have malaria and are treated for that disease, based only on clinical suspicion, and without the benefit of laboratory confirmation. This practice is dictated by practical considerations and allows the treatment of a potentially fatal disease. But it also leads frequently to incorrect diagnoses and unnecessary use of antimalarial drugs. This results in additional expenses and increases the risk of selecting for drug-resistant parasites. Microscopic Diagnosis Malaria parasites can be identified by examining under the microscope a drop of the patient's blood, spread out as a "blood smear" on a microscope slide. Prior to examination, the specimen is stained (most often with the Giemsa stain) to give to the parasites a distinctive appearance. This technique remains the gold standard for laboratory confirmation of malaria. However, it depends on the quality of the reagents, of the microscope, and on the experience of the laboratorian. Alternate methods for laboratory diagnosis include: Antigen Detection Various test kits are available to detect antigens derived from malaria parasites. Such immunologic ("immunochromatographic") tests most often use a dipstick or cassette format, and provide results in 2-10 minutes. These "Rapid Diagnostic Tests" (RDTs) offer a useful alternative to microscopy in situations where reliable microscopic diagnosis is not available. Malaria RDTs are currently used in some clinical settings and programs. However, before malaria RDTs can be widely adopted, several issues remain to be addressed, including improving their accuracy; lowering their cost; and ensuring their adequate performance under adverse field conditions. Malaria RDTs are currently not approved by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the United States. Molecular Diagnosis Parasite nucleic acids are detected using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This technique is more accurate than microscopy. However, it is expensive, and requires a specialized laboratory (even though technical advances will likely result in field-operated PCR machines). Serology Serology detects antibodies against malaria parasites, using either indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Serology does not detect current infection but rather measures past experience. Drug Resistance Tests Drug resistance tests are performed in specialized laboratories to assess the susceptibility to antimalarial compounds of parasites collected from a specific patient. Two main laboratory methods are available: In vitro tests: The parasites are grown in culture in the presence of increasing concentrations of drugs; the drug concentration that inhibits parasite growth is used as endpoint; Molecular characterization: molecular markers assessed by PCR or gene sequencing allow also the prediction, to some degree, of resistance to some drugs; however, the predictive values of these molecular tests are still being evaluated.
About the Author www.cdc.gov |
| ||||||
|
© 2008 eNotAlone.com | |||||||