Home | Forum | Search
Paul Mauchline
Paul Mauchline
The Dating Game
by Paul Mauchline

Dating: Is it indeed a game? Recent newspaper and magazine articles, and now even books, are transforming dating and courtship into a much more rigid, technical, and rule-based game of the sexes. For example, a few years back, millions of women all over the world rushed to their neighborhood bookstores to purchase "The Rules: Time Tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right," (Warner books) by authors Ellen Fein and Sherrie Schneider. Ms. Fein and Ms. Schneider advocate an approach to dating for women that is designed to "catch a man"-lure him, captivate him, and eventually steer him toward a committed relationship. The authors suggest that women today are too giving, open, and nice to men -- and that this approach causes men to lose interest quickly. Instead, they recommend that women play "hard to get," using a new set of rules, which they claim helped them to snare their own husbands. Some of their 35 Key Rules for courtship and dating include:

  • Don't talk to a man first.
  • Don't stare at a man or talk too much.
  • Don't go Dutch on a date or meet him anywhere. Have him pick you up.
  • Don't call him. Rarely return his calls.
  • Always end phone calls first.
  • Don't accept a Saturday night date after Wednesday.
  • Always end the date first.
  • Stop dating him if he doesn't buy you a romantic birthday or Valentine's gift.
  • Don't see him more than once or twice a week.
  • Be honest but mysterious.
  • Don't tell him what to do.
  • Let him take the lead.
  • Don't live with a man or leave things at his apartment.
  • Don't do anything else but casual kissing on the first date.
  • Don't rush into sex.
  • Don't discuss "The Rules" with your therapist.

The Rules, indeed, has generated a great deal of controversy. A major North American newspaper published an article entitled, "Love and War-The Mating Game is a War Zone with the Ground Rules Shifting from Moment to Moment." It explores the reaction by both women and men to The Rules. Reaction is mixed: most men find The Rules insulting and a definite turn off. Women, on the other hand, are divided. Many are willing to test this method since what they've been doing so far is not working. Many find that The Rules give them more distinct boundaries and a new found sense of power. Others, however, are of the opinion that The Rules take away the mystery, romance, and spontaneity that normally enliven a budding relationship. Still others say that The Rules, by prescribing a rigid approach to dating, reverses many of the sexual and relationship freedoms that women have gained over the past 40 years. I, myself, have some major concerns about these rules...

Let's consider, for example, the Rule, "Don't go Dutch on a date." This rule is troubling for two very important reasons. First of all, it has the potential to build resentment in the man: after all, why should the man pick up the whole check every time? It is unfair and possibly financially draining for him; it may cause him unnecessary financial and emotional stress. Suppose, for instance, the woman is a corporate executive and the man is a struggling artist or musician: Should the man always pay, even if the woman earns more money than he does? My second concern about this rule is that the expectation that the man should pay for every date is destructive to the balance of power in the relationship. By having this expectation, the woman is subtly communicating, both to her date and to herself, that she is somehow less financially capable than he is. She is, in essence, saying to him, "You are more able to provide than I am; your role is that of the provider." With all the advances we have made toward equality of the sexes over the past decades, I don't believe that a message that women are "less capable financially" is a welcome or healthy message to send out.

Another Rule I find troubling: "Don't accept a Saturday night date after Wednesday." Since when did making a date with someone have a three-day timeline? This Rule is designed to communicate to a suitor, "My time is important, and you have to respect that," and "I don't want to feel like you're scraping the bottom of the barrel of your little black book by calling me at the last minute." We all have busy, hectic schedules, and as adults, should respect one another's time. If you are the type of person that likes to plan ahead, then you need to communicate this fact. Eventually, when he sees that you plan your weekend by Wednesday or Thursday, your suitor will get the message. If he is truly interested in you, he will call ahead. If a man continually ignores that you prefer to plan ahead and always calls after your plans are made, you've got a problem. He's not showing you any respect, and if you love yourself, you will not tolerate this type of behavior, and will send him on his way.

My main concern about this Rule, however, is that it removes the ability for someone to be spontaneous. For example: Suppose it's a Friday afternoon. A guy that you have dated a few times, one in whom you are interested, calls you. You are surprised to hear from him, because you thought he was out of town. He tells you that he finished his business early, is back, and wants to know if you have any plans for Saturday night. If you have plans already, great. But if your dance card is empty, why not go out with him? Are you going to tell him, "Even though I don't have any plans, I won't go out with you because you didn't call me before Wednesday"? If a woman said this to me, I don't think that I'd ever call her again. Another example: you are sitting at home one evening. He drives by and sees the lights on, calls you from his car to say hello, and asks if you'd be interested in going for ice cream. If you are not busy or already going to sleep, wouldn't you enjoy his spontaneity and want to go for an ice cream with him? Dating and courtship should be full of surprises and spontaneity. By the way, there's nothing wrong, in my opinion, with a woman calling a man to make a date - whether it is three days, three hours, or three minutes in advance. It works both ways. Perhaps she enjoys being spontaneous, as well. By following the three-day advance-booking rule, I believe that we lose far more than we gain.

Next: Part 2


About the Author

The Art of Loving

More by Paul Mauchline
Related Topics
Dating For Men
Dating For Women
Cyber Relationships
Articles & Books
Before You Seek Mr. or Ms. Right
Are you a single adult seeking a committed relationship? If so, in my opinion, there are some important areas that you need to consciously examine before you search for Mr. or Ms. Right. First, you must carefully consider the question, "Am I ready fo
Are You The One For Me? Are You Not The One For Me?
How do you find a partner who is the right person for a committed, loving relationship? How do you know he or she is, indeed, the one for you?
Passion and Pensions: How to Balance Money Matters and Dating
Regardless of how many relationships you've had, it is always difficult to manage the financial issues of dating. Different money management styles, income and debt levels are just some of the money matters that the two of you may need to balance.

© Copyright 2000-2006 eNotalone.com Inc. All rights reserved